Re: suggestions, comments on an "is_subdict" test

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'subject:" ': 0.03; 'test,': 0.04; 'subject:test': 0.05; '>>>>': 0.09; 'from:addr:python': 0.09; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'mrab': 0.16; 'received:84.92': 0.16; 'received:84.92.122': 0.16; 'received:84.92.122.60': 0.16; 'received:84.93': 0.16; 'received:84.93.230': 0.16; 'reply-to:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'suggestions!': 0.16; 'code': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'values': 0.23; 'elegant': 0.23; 'high.': 0.23; 'keys': 0.23; 'received:84': 0.25; 'tried': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'looks': 0.28; 'thanks': 0.29; 'rid': 0.29; 'comparison': 0.31; 'however,': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; '(for': 0.33; 'communicate': 0.35; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.35; 'explicit': 0.35; 'reply-to:addr:python.org': 0.35; 'but': 0.38; 'set': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'works': 0.40; 'conversion': 0.64; 'it)': 0.68; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'header:Reply- To:1': 0.72
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered	true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result	AjoHAITqsU1UXebj/2dsb2JhbACYGo1Md4hwvFuFdgSSNIJV
Date	Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:57:56 +0100
From	MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version	1.0
To	python-list@python.org
Subject	Re: suggestions, comments on an "is_subdict" test
References	<BANLkTinazu41uVqxmkfTns0ZOHScZ1a3nQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DB190DC.8050307@mrabarnett.plus.com> <BANLkTin6SZP4gvWmv499DGFBsLxYYC3rCQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To	<BANLkTin6SZP4gvWmv499DGFBsLxYYC3rCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.12
Precedence	list
Reply-To	python-list@python.org
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.766.1303505884.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	19
NNTP-Posting-Host	82.94.164.166
X-Trace	1303505884 news.xs4all.nl 41113 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:60338
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:3894

Show key headers only | View raw

On 22/04/2011 21:31, Vlastimil Brom wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your opinions and suggestions!
> I especially like the all(...) approaches of MRAB and Peter Otten,
> however, the set conversion like
>>>> set(test_dct.items())<= set(base_dct.items())
> True
> looks elegant too.

That works only if the values in the dicts are hashable.

> In both approaches I can get rid of the negated comparison and the
> additional "parsing cost" (for me reading it) is not that high.
>
> As for the name,  I tried to make explicit (for this post), that both
> the keys and their values are important in this test, but it doesn't
> matter that much if is_subdict doesn't communicate this well
> (probably?), as the "audience" of this code is not going to be anyone
> but me.
>

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: suggestions, comments on an "is_subdict" test MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-04-22 21:57 +0100

csiph-web