Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #101861
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: "x == None" vs "x is None" |
| Date | Mon, 18 Jan 2016 08:38:59 +1100 |
| Lines | 26 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.76.1453066742.15297.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <n7fo7q$dso$1@news2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> <mailman.57.1453025729.15297.python-list@python.org> <n7fshb$f36$1@news2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> <CAPTjJmrDZCiDLmRtiukDv2Z1Gz69fz3+_4xYeu-PoXBdC3dtGg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ4+4aoHHzFJNHvw+LjimO6qHr6dsUskMsQw6y+uiW0jrQzm-w@mail.gmail.com> <m237tvj3hi.fsf@fastmail.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| X-Trace | news.uni-berlin.de k03iO4Qtyd7AqE8Z4/S8PAs+ddpfgM7gk1LINfkLCJoA== |
| Return-Path | <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.03; 'received:209.85.223': 0.03; 'none,': 0.05; 'expressions': 0.07; 'matches': 0.07; 'none)': 0.07; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'behave': 0.09; 'differently.': 0.09; 'subject:None': 0.09; 'jan': 0.11; '"is': 0.16; '2016': 0.16; 'distinct': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'none).': 0.16; 'null.': 0.16; 'partly': 0.16; 'pointer,': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'somewhere.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'not,': 0.22; 'null)': 0.22; 'trying': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; "python's": 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'compare': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'operators': 0.29; 'compared': 0.30; 'another': 0.32; 'null': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'generic': 0.35; 'quite': 0.35; "isn't": 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; 'subject:" ': 0.36; 'really': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.38; 'represent': 0.38; 'some': 0.40; 'is.': 0.63; 'different': 0.63; 'other.': 0.64; 'worth': 0.67; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'from"': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=vVf56/OVQNOrbF93irLzAyfBh2M8S+dz+s7ItH5M5+k=; b=aszyvdYyJm1mI50pstTjHSiqgrIrlu+vNA0WkIEmjH3CU5eIIDvnK/tqVp2G4H64eT GPvFs7juHd1EpIy5L01wDVLnZ2uolwR9qh/IRAqV4Po9IExpLV4+LYg8V3rr+12n1wTd 4yquON79rXggQjBx7MKOCOtbF2v3mfOSzHsLC5nXHH4r1JJzlbq6Ewnf1oIxWf+JZvTT aMRK0FdiiFKJfVTuxtFBk9SVo0UJdVusvEXaUTOilq0350Lt69w+xTx0OSxvCG2l5zdG 5DdGEgwoWr7/QjOX7NTW5q0vb2wMABrm4WJZlTyxxs2aXbyAdgDFTuPz7a7IKAzyi7Qf XZkQ== |
| X-Google-DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=vVf56/OVQNOrbF93irLzAyfBh2M8S+dz+s7ItH5M5+k=; b=ETFkRpxcKTFZ2Ch43kO16PR4z9aIREY4u7JucLLfHd7ckUcqwBUI22e/2rXRIx3NIN o35n4Xnj9dBNh1MCFjjVNcFWjxDrArwjKoSLByUC/Y8p0qxPe5mWRxxMfzCeeTZKSKgi XXAXP9TO9xuOs2+2877pSNLJT+fZHjEkjtNsZ3EPwWI7HoNOls0fK1miKbl4QaxI8bvo /RUA2pj36JCGZEVzELJxK6o9fXbX6CfOLDjpGRjN/lzFZhfxr+rdjmyxxIdc8d3akj/y s5qkxp6uM5Lv5YqjrL9zcko+Ag6e2pu5/CFOa95KdC05umJszffCRpt1Wo37KBXDql1u XdkQ== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | ALoCoQm+oLVCRp9nmO9ovEWHita0exG87zxJ6DWQjdzR9xZHZIh9gUm0MMgx20gaKaB78DX8cZnHw9F2UgzgJaynBbyYR06v2w== |
| X-Received | by 10.107.40.76 with SMTP id o73mr17440952ioo.157.1453066739394; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:38:59 -0800 (PST) |
| In-Reply-To | <m237tvj3hi.fsf@fastmail.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.20+ |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:101861 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> wrote: > <paul.hermeneutic@gmail.com> writes: > >> I prefer (x is None) and (x is not None). >> >> This matches the SQL concept of NULL. >> >> (X = NULL) is not valid since NULL is not a value and cannot be compared >> with anything. > > The suitably generic SQL operator is "is (not) distinct from", in some > dialects of SQL [certainly if you're using NULL directly you can simply > use is/is not, but the "distinct from" operators can be used to compare > two expressions that may either or both be NULL. > > "X is not distinct from Y" == "X = Y or X is NULL and Y is NULL" It's worth noting that Python's None is not really the same as SQL's NULL... although that's partly because nothing is. NULL isn't quite the same as IEEE NaN, nor C's null pointer, nor Python's None, all of which are quite different from each other. All of them can be used to represent some of the same concepts, but they behave very differently. Trying to explain one in terms of another is likely to trip people up somewhere. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"x == None" vs "x is None" Ulli Horlacher <framstag@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> - 2016-01-17 09:51 +0000
Re: "x == None" vs "x is None" Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 21:15 +1100
Re: "x == None" vs "x is None" Ulli Horlacher <framstag@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> - 2016-01-17 11:05 +0000
Re: "x == None" vs "x is None" Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-01-17 12:26 +0100
Re: "x == None" vs "x is None" Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 22:29 +1100
Re: "x == None" vs "x is None" <paul.hermeneutic@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 11:01 -0700
Re: "x == None" vs "x is None" Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-01-17 16:33 -0500
Re: "x == None" vs "x is None" Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 08:38 +1100
Re: "x == None" vs "x is None" Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-18 13:46 +1100
Re: "x == None" vs "x is None" fernando junior <fernandojr.ifcg@live.com> - 2016-01-19 14:20 -0800
csiph-web