Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #67462
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=python.org; s=200901; t=1393788339; bh=j8uwdgVbf7Go1PO50Ih/TLddwqCdEqEUzjDbMLTxvxI=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GTRmAr7SDeFMUAcsYuH9hgFJYpfV3PR24K+gEZrLXrmU3k5EDBzh2qjXEciXRQM4M lxyauLOyLP75Q89/gR9Cy+FR5xvPhcJgDY9DmWkjMniMllTM7rMUAbHu+uOUv61nue 7DMDhZbLGigb96c6GXgvj/e6MzsKJBJjBr1mV+Kg= |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.027 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'password)': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; '"it\'s': 0.16; 'banks.': 0.16; 'decade,': 0.16; 'from:name:christian heimes': 0.16; 'outdated': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:Password': 0.16; 'subject:issue': 0.16; 'subject:security': 0.16; 'from:addr:python.org': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'mechanism': 0.19; 'saying': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'source': 0.25; 'least': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'chris': 0.29; 'totally': 0.33; 'problem': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'passwords': 0.36; 'christian': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'itself': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'algorithms': 0.60; 'experts': 0.60; 'more': 0.64; 'secure': 0.71; 'increase': 0.74; 'low': 0.83; '15+': 0.84; 'insecure': 0.84; 'ksa': 0.84; 'received:89': 0.85; 'passwords,': 0.91; 'taught': 0.96 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> |
| Subject | Re: Password validation security issue |
| Date | Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:25:24 +0100 |
| References | <09f43567-779e-4d01-8621-c4eb36354d99@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmqCTLqXgmHMm2QGYJB1MmYEnhMV3OGe0jPc_UOoUQ9gQA@mail.gmail.com> <let920$fmn$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmq0MYQugUnsL52ZN0um=V3iABHmM4+vsffD=+2YV7t=MA@mail.gmail.com> <letdt5$1g3$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmra0AjHYjk3G+2mSgsewpX0qcmcKpQtqnebHXsQfT2YqQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | 89.204.138.215 |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <CAPTjJmra0AjHYjk3G+2mSgsewpX0qcmcKpQtqnebHXsQfT2YqQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Enigmail-Version | 1.5.2 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.7592.1393788339.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 19 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1393788339 news.xs4all.nl 2935 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35241 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:67462 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 01.03.2014 21:11, Chris Angelico wrote: > The problem isn't SHA-256. The problem is insecure passwords, the way > we've been taught to make them by the banks. Hence, XKCD 936. Your argumentation is just wrong. You are saying "It's OK to use a totally insecure way to hash passwords because passwords are insecure". The point of KDF and KSA is to derive some token from a low entropy source (human input) that makes an attack harder. Please do your reading and trust secure experts on algorithms like PBKDF2, bcrypt and scrypt. hash(salt + password) is outdated and proven to be insecure for at least a decade, more like 15+ years. The concept of passwords itself is insecure. But we are stuck with passwords for authentication mechanism for the foreseeable future. 2FA is an attempt to increase the security of passwords-based authentication schemes. Christian
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Password validation security issue Renato <rvernucio@gmail.com> - 2014-03-01 09:49 -0800
Re: Password validation security issue Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 05:11 +1100
Re: Password validation security issue Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> - 2014-03-01 19:31 +0100
Re: Password validation security issue Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-03-01 12:38 -0600
Re: Password validation security issue Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 05:43 +1100
Re: Password validation security issue Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 05:45 +1100
Re: Password validation security issue Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> - 2014-03-01 20:54 +0100
Re: Password validation security issue Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-03-01 15:25 -0500
Re: Password validation security issue Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> - 2014-03-01 23:07 +0100
Re: Password validation security issue Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 09:13 +1100
Re: Password validation security issue Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 07:11 +1100
Re: Password validation security issue Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> - 2014-03-02 20:25 +0100
Re: Password validation security issue Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-03-02 15:01 -0500
Re: Password validation security issue Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 07:32 +1100
Re: Password validation security issue Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-03 01:16 +0000
Re: Password validation security issue Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 18:52 -0700
Re: Password validation security issue Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-03 04:38 +0000
Re: Password validation security issue Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 16:44 +1100
Re: Password validation security issue Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 23:50 -0700
Re: Password validation security issue Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 13:56 +1100
Re: Password validation security issue Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-03-03 08:41 -0500
Re: Password validation security issue Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-04 00:55 +1100
Re: Password validation security issue Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-03 16:46 +0000
Re: Password validation security issue Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-04 05:46 +1100
Re: Password validation security issue MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-03-03 16:29 +0000
Re: Password validation security issue Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-03 17:41 +0000
Re: Password validation security issue Renato <rvernucio@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 15:10 -0800
Re: Password validation security issue Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 18:49 -0700
Re: Password validation security issue Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-03 02:30 +0000
csiph-web