Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #99456

Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?)

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?)
Date Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:17:43 +0100
Lines 45
Message-ID <mailman.75.1448461064.20593.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <CAPTjJmpwjWnF=d6mpgbKS1biVLoR4APutgyH0n9t6CJ=Kh4dCg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.484.1447964295.16136.python-list@python.org> <87d1v5emhl.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <564e6a62$0$1620$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.54.1448439359.20593.python-list@python.org> <565592e9$0$1615$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <5655A8B3.6000103@rece.vub.ac.be> <CAPTjJmq8+jERjPrcnWrDu7A4OMUigF=Vv=SwokQA6Q0Wb85kjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de MoXypCzUkqX1z0JT4Kl/eA2VT/4WsDvvJuBqjnP0gAyw==
Return-Path <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.014
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; '(even': 0.05; 'kind,': 0.05; 'received:134': 0.05; 'consistency.': 0.09; 'implies': 0.09; 'indication': 0.09; 'matched': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'wed,': 0.15; 'result.': 0.15; 'subject: \n ': 0.15; 'attitude.': 0.16; 'declaration': 0.16; 'declares': 0.16; 'received:ac.be': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:?)': 0.16; 'utterly': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '>>>': 0.20; '2015': 0.20; 'saying': 0.22; 'aspect': 0.22; 'interpret': 0.22; 'trying': 0.22; "python's": 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; "doesn't": 0.26; 'sense': 0.26; 'chris': 0.26; 'mostly': 0.27; 'have,': 0.27; 'tend': 0.27; 'behaviour': 0.29; 'consistency': 0.29; 'equally': 0.29; 'far,': 0.29; 'received:be': 0.30; 'guess': 0.31; 'certain': 0.31; 'continuing': 0.32; 'language.': 0.32; 'useful': 0.33; 'impression': 0.33; 'attempt': 0.35; 'nov': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'sometimes': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'instead': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'say': 0.37; 'seem': 0.37; 'things': 0.38; 'difference': 0.38; 'wrong': 0.38; 'anything': 0.38; 'someone': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'system.': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'still': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'telling': 0.61; 'show': 0.62; 'making': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'different': 0.63; 'between': 0.65; 'talking': 0.67; 'designers': 0.72; 'feeling': 0.72; 'honest': 0.76; 'angelico:': 0.84; 'defensive': 0.84; 'fact.': 0.84; 'lacks': 0.84; 'pardon': 0.84; 'schreef': 0.84; 'magical': 0.93
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result AnsKADTCVVaGuA9G/2dsb2JhbABehFcBJcA1hg8CggwBAQEBAQGFPwEBAQMBI1UGCwsYAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECAUUTBgICiCIIrVOMDoQlAQEIAiGBAYVThH6FJ4JOgUQFlleNNYFchzSPXINyY4JEgUFxAYUrAQEB
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0
In-Reply-To <CAPTjJmq8+jERjPrcnWrDu7A4OMUigF=Vv=SwokQA6Q0Wb85kjQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:99456

Show key headers only | View raw


Op 25-11-15 om 14:24 schreef Chris Angelico:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Antoon Pardon
> <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> wrote:
>>> But there's a big difference between those who guess wrong from a position
>>> of ignorance, and then make an honest attempt to understand the behaviour
>>> and why it actually does make sense and is even sometimes useful (even if
>>> they don't like it), and those people who insist that it is nonsensical,
>>> magical and "bizarre".
>> There is an equally big difference between trying to explain what is going
>> on and insisting that what is going on is not bizarre.
> There is also a big difference between finding that something doesn't
> match your expectations and declaring that it is "bizarre", which
> implies that it makes no sense *to anyone*. What we've been pointing
> out to you is that Python's way *does* make sense - just a different
> sense from the one you're expecting.

I find the above a very defensive attitude. People are mostly not
very accurate in how they put things into words. People tend to
say that something was delicious instead of saying that they
found it delicious. So when someone declares as aspect of python
to be bizarre I interpret that as an indication of what impression
that aspect made on that person instead of some declaration of fact.
So stop feeling attacked because someone found something bizarre.

You also seem to think that bizarre contradicts making sense. It
is entirly possible to understand what is going on and still find
it bizarre that the designers allowed for certain kinds or result.

> If you want to call Python's system "bizarre", you have to show more
> than just that your expectations weren't matched by the language. You
> have to show that Python lacks internal sense or consistency. You
> have, so far, not shown anything of the kind, ergo we are continuing
> to insist that Python is NOT bizarre.

No I don't have to show any such thing. There are things with an internal
sense of consistency that can be found utterly bizarre. I also find it
telling that you go from me talking about someone thinking that what is
going on in a specific aspect of python being bizarre, to regarding 
such a person as calling Python's system "bizarre", as if judging one
aspect is like judging the whole system. 

-- 
Antoon.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-11-19 21:18 +0100
  Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-19 22:57 +0200
    Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-11-19 23:41 +0100
      Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-20 14:00 +0000
    Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-11-20 11:33 +1100
      Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2015-11-25 09:14 +0100
        Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-11-25 21:52 +1100
          Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2015-11-25 13:25 +0100
          Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-25 13:20 +0000
            Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-11-25 07:13 -0800
              Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-11-25 16:59 +0100
                Multiplication [was Re: Late-binding of function defaults] Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-11-26 05:09 +1100
                Re: Multiplication [was Re: Late-binding of function defaults] Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-11-25 19:45 +0100
                Re: Multiplication [was Re: Late-binding of function defaults] Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-25 23:04 +0200
              Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Arie van Wingerden <xapwing@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 17:12 +0100
              Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 03:29 +1100
              Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-25 17:18 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 11:03 -0700
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-25 18:48 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-11-25 20:50 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-25 21:56 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-26 00:16 +0200
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-25 22:41 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-11-26 11:31 +1100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-26 01:23 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2015-11-25 17:52 -0800
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-11-26 16:08 +1100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-11-26 06:39 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2015-11-26 09:31 +0100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-26 12:53 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 00:15 +1100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-26 14:40 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2015-11-26 16:14 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-26 22:27 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 10:07 +1100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2015-11-26 19:15 -0500
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 11:48 +1100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2015-11-27 01:15 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2015-11-26 16:16 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function   parameter =[] for?) Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-11-27 10:48 +1300
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-11-27 12:46 +1100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-27 02:01 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-26 08:41 +0200
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-11-27 12:09 +1100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-27 10:31 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-27 13:30 +0200
              Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-11-26 06:57 +1100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-25 23:00 +0200
            Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2015-11-25 10:56 -0800
            Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-11-26 13:01 +1100
          Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 00:24 +1100
          Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2015-11-25 15:17 +0100
          Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2015-11-25 10:51 -0800
      Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 19:32 +1100
        Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-25 10:43 +0200
          Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-11-25 21:58 +1100
        Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-25 12:35 +0000
          Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-25 15:06 +0200
            Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-25 13:37 +0000
              Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-25 15:53 +0200
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-25 14:34 +0000
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-25 13:32 -0500
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-11-26 11:53 +1100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-26 08:52 +0200
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 18:14 +1100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-26 10:27 +0200
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 19:34 +1100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-26 12:54 +0200
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 22:04 +1100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-26 13:23 +0200
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 22:35 +1100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-26 14:03 +0200
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-11-27 12:43 +1100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2015-11-26 09:45 +0100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-11-27 10:20 +1300
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-26 23:36 +0200
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-11-27 12:23 +1100
                Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-11-26 11:17 +0000
            Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 00:44 +1100
            Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-11-26 06:55 +1100
            Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2015-11-26 00:52 +0000
            Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 20:01 -0700
            Semantics of collection types (was: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?)) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-11-26 16:04 +1100
          Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 00:35 +1100
        Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Larry Hudson <orgnut@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-25 22:44 -0800
      Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2015-11-25 10:13 +0100

csiph-web