Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #3871
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:" ': 0.03; 'subject:test': 0.05; 'dictionary': 0.07; '>>>>': 0.09; 'builtin': 0.09; 'exceptions': 0.09; 'from:addr:python': 0.09; 'value:': 0.09; 'slightly': 0.12; 'solutions,': 0.12; 'def': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.14; '"""test': 0.16; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'passed.': 0.16; 'received:84.92': 0.16; 'received:84.92.122': 0.16; 'received:84.92.122.60': 0.16; 'received:84.93': 0.16; 'received:84.93.230': 0.16; 'reply-to:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'shorten': 0.16; 'possibly': 0.16; 'have:': 0.19; 'maybe': 0.21; 'code': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'unsure': 0.23; 'received:84': 0.25; 'testing': 0.28; 'missed': 0.29; '(the': 0.30; 'seem': 0.30; 'this.': 0.30; 'comparison': 0.31; 'key,': 0.31; 'all,': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; 'reference': 0.34; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.35; 'reply-to:addr:python.org': 0.35; 'some': 0.37; 'case': 0.37; 'ways': 0.38; 'anything': 0.38; 'ok,': 0.39; 'comments': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'could': 0.39; 'i.e.': 0.40; 'simple': 0.60; 'unique': 0.63; 'worth': 0.64; 'special': 0.66; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.72; 'idiomatic': 0.84 |
| X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered | true |
| X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result | AhUIAM+PsU1UXebj/2dsb2JhbACYEo1Md8NrhXYEkjSCVQ |
| Date | Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:29:48 +0100 |
| From | MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Subject | Re: suggestions, comments on an "is_subdict" test |
| References | <BANLkTinazu41uVqxmkfTns0ZOHScZ1a3nQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-Reply-To | <BANLkTinazu41uVqxmkfTns0ZOHScZ1a3nQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| Reply-To | python-list@python.org |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.748.1303482591.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 31 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 82.94.164.166 |
| X-Trace | 1303482591 news.xs4all.nl 81478 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:49595 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:3871 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 22/04/2011 14:55, Vlastimil Brom wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'd like to ask for comments or advice on a simple code for testing a
> "subdict", i.e. check whether all items of a given dictionary are
> present in a reference dictionary.
> Sofar I have:
>
> def is_subdict(test_dct, base_dct):
> """Test whether all the items of test_dct are present in base_dct."""
> unique_obj = object()
> for key, value in test_dct.items():
> if not base_dct.get(key, unique_obj) == value:
> return False
> return True
>
> I'd like to ask for possibly more idiomatic solutions, or more obvious
> ways to do this. Did I maybe missed some builtin possibility?
> I am unsure whether the check against an unique object() or the
> negated comparison are usual.?
> (The builtin exceptions are ok, in case anything not dict-like is
> passed. A cornercase like>>> is_subdict({}, 4)
>>>> True
> doesen't seem to be worth a special check just now.)
>
You could shorten it slightly to:
def is_subdict(test_dct, base_dct):
"""Test whether all the items of test_dct are present in base_dct."""
unique_obj = object()
return all(base_dct.get(key, unique_obj) == value for key, value in
test_dct.items())
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: suggestions, comments on an "is_subdict" test MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-04-22 15:29 +0100
csiph-web