Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #8981
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.018 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'numerical': 0.05; '"""': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'wed,': 0.12; 'wrote:': 0.15; 'billy': 0.16; 'core.': 0.16; 'algorithm': 0.16; 'pm,': 0.16; 'large,': 0.19; 'starts': 0.19; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'libraries': 0.25; 'noticed': 0.26; 'beyond': 0.28; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'wondering': 0.30; 'subject:number': 0.30; 'source': 0.32; 'implementing': 0.32; 'rather': 0.33; 'done': 0.33; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.34; 'there': 0.34; 'probably': 0.35; 'using': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85.161': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'think': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.40; 'chosen': 0.40; 'methods': 0.40; 'according': 0.63; 'benefit': 0.66; 'specialized': 0.71; '40,000': 0.84 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2yxJtYMmqQxpZMP8bgtQlNPKjygn5aelJSaELaaq5UM=; b=CIX18+ehly2C3v+ojfL+4thMNF247GpY6H2M+EmtOUw561KjbbTTbgPirxOsEj80bG ph1jMGFgeKOVjEKrmBN+D6Vo6ZyD0Xa1i7RpZYefCVi++ly2q9GphLL8qxVae98qctmu vE9bnRopnyU+EkIBy7G9nUexpkUsaL0diUoak= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <iv2d7n$ksv$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| References | <iv2d7n$ksv$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | Wed, 6 Jul 2011 14:02:04 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Large number multiplication |
| To | Python <python-list@python.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.721.1309982555.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 20 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1309982555 news.xs4all.nl 21775 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33459 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8981 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Billy Mays <noway@nohow.com> wrote: > I was looking through the python source and noticed that long multiplication > is done using the Karatsuba method (O(~n^1.5)) rather than using FFTs O(~n > log n). I was wondering if there was a reason the Karatsuba method was > chosen over the FFT convolution method? According to Wikipedia: """ In practice the Schönhage–Strassen algorithm starts to outperform older methods such as Karatsuba and Toom–Cook multiplication for numbers beyond 2**2**15 to 2**2**17 (10,000 to 40,000 decimal digits). """ I think most Python users are probably not working with numbers that large, and if they are, they are probably using specialized numerical libraries anyway, so there would be little benefit in implementing it in core.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Large number multiplication Billy Mays <noway@nohow.com> - 2011-07-06 15:30 -0400
Re: Large number multiplication Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-07-06 14:02 -0600
Re: Large number multiplication Billy Mays <noway@nohow.com> - 2011-07-06 16:21 -0400
Re: Large number multiplication Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-07-06 14:37 -0600
Re: Large number multiplication Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2011-07-07 10:30 +0200
Re: Large number multiplication Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-07-07 09:49 -0600
Re: Large number multiplication Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-07-07 09:50 -0600
Re: Large number multiplication casevh <casevh@gmail.com> - 2011-07-07 10:46 -0700
Re: Large number multiplication Mark Dickinson <mdickinson@enthought.com> - 2011-07-08 00:31 -0700
Re: Large number multiplication Parerga <nabble.com@bodrato.it> - 2011-07-07 09:00 -0700
Re: Large number multiplication Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> - 2011-07-06 22:05 +0200
Re: Large number multiplication Billy Mays <noway@nohow.com> - 2011-07-06 16:15 -0400
Re: Large number multiplication Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> - 2011-07-06 22:43 +0200
Re: Large number multiplication Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-07-07 01:33 +0100
csiph-web