Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #102854
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: asyncio and blocking - an update |
| Date | 2016-02-12 19:19 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.72.1455265184.22075.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <CAPTjJmrVCkKAEevc9TW8FYYTnZgRUMPHectz+bD=DQRphXYTpw@mail.gmail.com> <n9ha5v$pb9$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmor8dMv2TDtq8RHQgWeSAaZgAmxK9gFth=OojhidWHs3w@mail.gmail.com> <n9hjfp$ad7$1@ger.gmane.org> <n9k4f5$p8s$1@ger.gmane.org> |
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Frank Millman <frank@chagford.com> wrote: > Using run_in_executor() and cur.fetchall(), I experience delays of up to 2 > seconds while the task is active. > > Using my approach, the maximum I saw was about a tenth of a second, and that > is because I was looking for it - a normal user would not notice. Obviously > the task took longer, but I can live with that trade-off. That looks like good, useful data! Cool. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: asyncio and blocking - an update Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 19:19 +1100
csiph-web