Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #94122
| From | Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? |
| References | <moenuj$f11$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.709.1437298070.3674.python-list@python.org><55abad41$0$1642$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| Date | 2015-07-19 16:18 +0200 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.718.1437315498.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
In a message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 23:59:29 +1000, "Steven D'Aprano" writes: >Bug for bug compatible back to the 1970s, right? :-) No, till the last posix in 1989 or so. Definitely not to the 1970s as we want v7 c structs and x++ not the v6 ++x version. :) Laura
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-07-19 11:27 +0200
Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-19 23:59 +1000
Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-07-19 16:15 +0200
Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-07-19 16:18 +0200
csiph-web