Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #109093

Re: multiprocessing not quite working

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: multiprocessing not quite working
Date Wed, 25 May 2016 00:39:38 +0100
Lines 83
Message-ID <mailman.71.1464133185.20402.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <f803eff5-786e-703f-4625-69f5e64c6a6e@enabled.com> <5ec4b860-e38d-55f4-1d54-d1f944bfeb33@mrabarnett.plus.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de Kj4doDWlviVmOIkptn4YxQFsoLrnHCWaHcFLraPT0jTg==
Return-Path <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'skip:[ 20': 0.03; '"""': 0.05; '(python': 0.05; 'tries': 0.05; 'exit': 0.07; 'subject:skip:m 10': 0.09; 'example:': 0.10; 'subject:not': 0.11; 'output': 0.13; 'def': 0.13; '"."': 0.16; '"got': 0.16; 'appends': 0.16; 'consume': 0.16; 'deadlock': 0.16; 'flushed': 0.16; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'here"': 0.16; 'main():': 0.16; 'message- id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'pipes': 0.16; 'processes.': 0.16; 'received:192.168.1.4': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'similarly,': 0.16; 'skip:j 30': 0.16; 'skip:z 30': 0.16; 'stringio()': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'skip:{ 20': 0.18; 'issue.': 0.20; 'terminate': 0.22; 'trying': 0.22; 'programming': 0.22; 'url:edu': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'define': 0.27; "skip:' 10": 0.28; 'issues.': 0.29; 'joining': 0.29; 'queue': 0.29; 'array': 0.29; 'print': 0.30; 'code': 0.30; 'skip:[ 10': 0.31; 'says': 0.32; 'returned': 0.32; 'getting': 0.33; 'run': 0.33; 'url:06': 0.33; 'previous': 0.34; 'list': 0.34; 'comment': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'created': 0.36; '(and': 0.36; 'child': 0.36; 'skip:{ 10': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'skip:o 20': 0.38; 'hi,': 0.38; 'means': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'hang': 0.60; 'above,': 0.63; 'url:2014': 0.66; 'here': 0.66; 'results': 0.66; 'therefore': 0.67; 'completed': 0.69; 'children.': 0.76; '*if': 0.84; 'guidelines.': 0.84
X-CM-Score 0.00
X-CNFS-Analysis v=2.1 cv=K//fZHiI c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=G1H9XeTJAAAA:8 a=Corov10P02hWNBMcYhUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=g6OYqls-1w_fQhGz_oZa:22
X-AUTH mrabarnett@:2500
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
In-Reply-To <f803eff5-786e-703f-4625-69f5e64c6a6e@enabled.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <5ec4b860-e38d-55f4-1d54-d1f944bfeb33@mrabarnett.plus.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <f803eff5-786e-703f-4625-69f5e64c6a6e@enabled.com>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:109093

Show key headers only | View raw


On 2016-05-24 23:17, Noah wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using this example:
> http://spartanideas.msu.edu/2014/06/20/an-introduction-to-parallel-programming-using-pythons-multiprocessing-module/
>
> I am sending and receiving communication from the worker processes.
>
> Two issues. the join is only getting to the process and waiting.
> When I comment out the .join() process the output.get() appends the
> previous process and therefore the returned output keeps getting longer
> and longer after each process returns its output.
>
> hostnames is an array of hostnames.
>
> here is my code from main():
>
>      # Define an output queue
>      output = mp.Queue()
>
>      # Setup a list of processes that we want to run
>      processes = [mp.Process(target=worker, args=(hostnames[x], output))
> for x in range(len(hostnames))]
>
>      # Run processes
>      for p in processes:
>          print "start: {}".format(p)
>          p.start()
>
>      time.sleep(6)
>      print "processes: {}".format(processes)
>
>      # Exit the completed processes
>      '''for p in processes:
>          print "join: {}".format(p)
>          p.join()'''
>
>      print "got here"
>      # Get process results from the output queue
>      # results = [output.get() for p in processes]
>
>      io = StringIO()
>      count = 0
>      for p in processes:
>          found_output = output.get()
>          print "returned {}".format(p)
>          io.write (found_output)
>          zipArchive.writestr(hostnames[count] + "." +
> content['sitename'] + '.config.txt', io.getvalue())
>          count = count + 1
>      io.close()
>
>
> def worker(hostname, output):
> .
> .
> .
>          output.put(template_output)
>
>
It says in the docs (Python 2.7, 16.6.2.2. Pipes and Queues):

"""Warning
As mentioned above, if a child process has put items on a queue (and it 
has not used JoinableQueue.cancel_join_thread), then that process will 
not terminate until all buffered items have been flushed to the pipe.

This means that *if you try joining that process you may get a deadlock 
unless you are sure that all items which have been put on the queue have 
been consumed*. Similarly, if the child process is non-daemonic then the 
parent process may hang on exit when it tries to join all its 
non-daemonic children.

Note that a queue created using a manager does not have this issue. See 
Programming guidelines.
"""

(Asterisks added to highlight.)

You should try to consume the output from a process before trying to 
join it (or, at least, join it without a timeout).

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: multiprocessing not quite working MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2016-05-25 00:39 +0100

csiph-web