Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #66600
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.001 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'cpython': 0.05; 'filing': 0.07; 'variables': 0.07; 'optimizing': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:Does': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'bug': 0.12; 'article:': 0.16; 'folding.': 0.16; 'pypy.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:already': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'code.': 0.18; 'feb': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'byte': 0.24; 'received:comcast.net': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'tried': 0.27; 'url:bugs': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'constant': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'disable': 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'url:python': 0.33; 'not.': 0.33; 'role': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'expect': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'read': 0.60; 'simple': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'show': 0.63; 'kind': 0.63; 'love': 0.65; 'temporary': 0.65; 'apart': 0.72; 'subject:skip:o 10': 0.84 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> |
| Subject | Re: Does CPython already has Peephole optimizations? |
| Date | Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:48:00 -0500 |
| References | <mailman.7086.1392625473.18130.python-list@python.org> <5301cf82$0$29985$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | c-50-133-228-126.hsd1.ma.comcast.net |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <5301cf82$0$29985$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.7092.1392641296.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 36 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1392641296 news.xs4all.nl 2943 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50728 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:66600 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2/17/14 3:59 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:54:25 +0530, Laxmikant Chitare wrote: > >> I read about this article: >> http://www.python.org/workshops/1998-11/proceedings/papers/montanaro/ > montanaro.html >> >> Just wanted to clarify whether CPython already includes these kind of >> byte code optimizations? Are all the temporary variables removed when >> byte code is generated? > > > You can check these things for yourself: > > import dis > dis.dis(function) > > > will show you the byte code. > > But in general, I would expect not. CPython (that's the Python you > probably use) doesn't do a lot of optimization apart from some simple > constant folding. If you're interested in optimizing Python, you should > look at the JIT optimizing Python compiler, PyPy. > > CPython does some constant folding, and also jump optimizations. In my role as coverage.py maintainer, I would love to see a way to disable all those optimizations. I tried filing a bug about it (http://bugs.python.org/issue2506), but it did not win the popular support I had hoped for. -- Ned Batchelder, http://nedbatchelder.com
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Does CPython already has Peephole optimizations? Laxmikant Chitare <laxmikant.general@gmail.com> - 2014-02-17 13:54 +0530
Re: Does CPython already has Peephole optimizations? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-02-17 08:59 +0000
Re: Does CPython already has Peephole optimizations? Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-02-17 07:48 -0500
Re: Does CPython already has Peephole optimizations? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-02-17 08:51 -0500
Re: Does CPython already has Peephole optimizations? Laxmikant Chitare <laxmikant.general@gmail.com> - 2014-02-18 10:41 +0530
csiph-web