Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #8961
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Does hashlib support a file mode? |
| Date | 2011-07-06 19:06 +0200 |
| Organization | None |
| References | <453cc47b-b545-4bcf-91c0-2efe2aae37bd@v11g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <mailman.704.1309969573.1164.python-list@python.org> <b317226a-8008-4177-aaa6-3fdc30125eea@e20g2000prf.googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.709.1309971973.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Phlip wrote: >> - Open the file in binary mode. > > I had tried open(path, 'rb') and it didn't change the "wrong" number. > > And I added --binary to my evil md5sum version, and it didn't change > the "right" number! > > Gods bless those legacy hacks that will never die, huh? But I'm using > Ubuntu (inside VMWare, on Win7, on a Core i7, because I rule), so that > might explain why "binary mode" is a no-op. Indeed. That part was a defensive measure mostly meant to make your function Windows-proof. >> - Do the usual dance for default arguments: >> def file_to_hash(path, m=None): >> if m is None: >> m = hashlib.md5() > > Not sure why if that's what the defaulter does? I did indeed get an > MD5-style string of what casually appeared to be the right length, so > that implies the defaulter is not to blame... The first call will give you the correct checksum, the second: not. As the default md5 instance remembers the state from the previous function call you'll get the checksum of both files combined.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Does hashlib support a file mode? Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> - 2011-07-06 08:59 -0700
Re: Does hashlib support a file mode? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-07-06 18:26 +0200
Re: Does hashlib support a file mode? Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> - 2011-07-06 09:49 -0700
Re: Does hashlib support a file mode? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-07-06 19:06 +0200
Re: Does hashlib support a file mode? Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> - 2011-07-06 10:38 -0700
Re: Does hashlib support a file mode? Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-07-06 13:42 -0500
Re: Does hashlib support a file mode? Chris Torek <nospam@torek.net> - 2011-07-06 17:54 +0000
csiph-web