Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #66595
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.002 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'cpython': 0.05; '(b)': 0.07; 'variables': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:Does': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; 'article:': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'subject:already': 0.16; 'url:file': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'all,': 0.19; 'feb': 0.22; '>>>': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; '(a)': 0.24; 'byte': 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; '(c)': 0.29; 'skip:( 20': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'linux': 0.33; 'url:python': 0.33; 'there': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'read': 0.60; 'kind': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'temporary': 0.65; 'url:c': 0.67; '2014,': 0.84; 'subject:skip:o 10': 0.84; 'url:cpython': 0.84 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
| Subject | Re: Does CPython already has Peephole optimizations? |
| Date | Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:45:47 +0100 |
| Organization | None |
| References | <CAFtnWG9Zm75mQY--54mYMyHvNhhanr51VBjRDMK4xMoo_AaxNQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | p57bdb5c1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.7.3 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.7087.1392626746.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 42 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1392626746 news.xs4all.nl 2915 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45480 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:66595 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Laxmikant Chitare wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I read about this article:
>
http://www.python.org/workshops/1998-11/proceedings/papers/montanaro/montanaro.html
>
> Just wanted to clarify whether CPython already includes these kind of byte
> code optimizations? Are all the temporary variables removed when byte code
> is generated?
You can find out for yourself:
Python 3.4.0rc1+ (default:2ba583191550+, Feb 12 2014, 00:08:44)
[GCC 4.6.1] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import dis
>>> def f():
... a, b, c = 1, 2, 3
...
>>> dis.dis(f)
2 0 LOAD_CONST 4 ((1, 2, 3))
3 UNPACK_SEQUENCE 3
6 STORE_FAST 0 (a)
9 STORE_FAST 1 (b)
12 STORE_FAST 2 (c)
15 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
18 RETURN_VALUE
>>> def g():
... q = 2 + 3j
...
>>> dis.dis(g)
2 0 LOAD_CONST 3 ((2+3j))
3 STORE_FAST 0 (q)
6 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
9 RETURN_VALUE
If you can read C there is also
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/180e4b678003/Python/peephole.c
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Does CPython already has Peephole optimizations? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-02-17 09:45 +0100
csiph-web