Does CPython already has Peephole optimizations?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<laxmikant.general@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.042
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.92; 'S': 0.00; 'cpython': 0.05; 'variables': 0.07; 'subject:Does': 0.09; 'article:': 0.16; 'subject:already': 0.16; 'all,': 0.19; '8bit%:5': 0.22; 'byte': 0.24; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'url:python': 0.33; 'to:name:python-list': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'read': 0.60; 'kind': 0.63; 'temporary': 0.65; 'subject:skip:o 10': 0.84
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FjxEgMyjySW3AqL4ajAS1ZPwXwAGBrLHS1xF1QqJoxs=; b=QdhaWe2Y80CakARDe+E2Su2nhxL3ENXl0z+GxEIE3rtRuavSCq2+vtYLXF7p0DI+ta roRmLh/+4VGB/fd5/1ylgD7Un1lPRgr5trWZwrADzKDv+VBo1CGI55r+nQFYaKQBoTuT BBl/ZemiGggHEWIqtoYsQxQkiNEXPwLfniWkouDbXVaoZpnmLZ+2fltjJrr5sVGg7/na NlYJ0Tl3l2AgXyPev42KFOnTEGp8b7GYuRRLyYmYFNrCfhKStqUtV2XZ1829gOwr/8uo BxB8/kjlxBOQt+Q6cyMeWNJWNAPtjuRf9o0wzOvOOhSE9x1MfBNeNcGf3AKIi2uovE+c sBqw==
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Received	by 10.140.83.203 with SMTP id j69mr30785534qgd.42.1392625465215; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:24:25 -0800 (PST)
Date	Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:54:25 +0530
Subject	Does CPython already has Peephole optimizations?
From	Laxmikant Chitare <laxmikant.general@gmail.com>
To	python-list <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type	multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c11ed828ce1304f295e28f
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.7086.1392625473.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	30
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1392625473 news.xs4all.nl 2843 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40235
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:66594

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hello All,

I read about this article:
http://www.python.org/workshops/1998-11/proceedings/papers/montanaro/montanaro.html

Just wanted to clarify whether CPython already includes these kind of byte
code optimizations? Are all the temporary variables removed when byte code
is generated?

Regards,
Laxmikant

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Does CPython already has Peephole optimizations? Laxmikant Chitare <laxmikant.general@gmail.com> - 2014-02-17 13:54 +0530
  Re: Does CPython already has Peephole optimizations? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-02-17 08:59 +0000
    Re: Does CPython already has Peephole optimizations? Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-02-17 07:48 -0500
    Re: Does CPython already has Peephole optimizations? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-02-17 08:51 -0500
    Re: Does CPython already has Peephole optimizations? Laxmikant Chitare <laxmikant.general@gmail.com> - 2014-02-18 10:41 +0530

csiph-web