Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #102504
| From | Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Reply to whom? |
| Date | 2016-02-04 13:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.70.1454612024.30993.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <56B26D3D.6040703@mail.de> <CAERt=-zUi-9TeKU-M5siEBDme22X7gNEPWdn2vc8KbUtFikuYQ@mail.gmail.com> <85h9hpcvjw.fsf_-_@benfinney.id.au> <1454561022.2123037.511515122.153B155A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <85si19avvi.fsf@benfinney.id.au> |
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:26 AM, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016, at 16:50, Ben Finney wrote: > > > (You will also have a “reply to all” command. That's almost never > > > appropriate in a forum like this.) > > > > Why not? People reply all to messages I write all the time, and I find > > it somewhat useful since it separates replies to things I have said > > from discussions I'm not part of. > > That's nice for you that it coincides with what you find useful. For > those who don't want messages to the forum duplicated in their inbox, > the behaviour is obnoxious. > > In other words: Using “reply to all” on a forum like this is > inappropriate because you can't know what every participant wants, so > your set of recipients should be conservative and err on the side of not > sending a duplicate message to people who didn't ask for it. > > -- > \ “Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas | > `\ are any good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats.” | > _o__) —Howard Aiken | > Ben Finney > > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > I use gmail and hit reply all and then (usually, unless i forget) delete all recipients except the group -- Joel Goldstick http://joelgoldstick.com/stats/birthdays
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Reply to whom? Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 13:53 -0500
csiph-web