Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #110926
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions |
| Date | Sat, 02 Jul 2016 11:52:07 +1000 |
| Lines | 35 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.7.1467424342.2295.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <85mvm5vrbw.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mailman.61.1467090177.2358.python-list@python.org> <0690f476-95ad-4dec-87e5-42ecee07fdcd@googlegroups.com> <nl2hh5$ar7$1@ger.gmane.org> <87poqx96ul.fsf@handshake.de> <mailman.153.1467356702.2358.python-list@python.org> <87bn2h85rn.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <8537nsvmbc.fsf@benfinney.id.au> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | news.uni-berlin.de sPo4Z93o/oajooVRz0B/gA/6lauVePqkZLVi8I8TVhMA== |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:qQvdkRfHk8X4VdoK8qLNgj3vgo8= |
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.070 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.86; '*S*': 0.01; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'lambda': 0.16; 'parts,': 0.16; 'rather,': 0.16; 'readable': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:parameters': 0.16; 'nested': 0.18; 'accepting': 0.18; 'function,': 0.22; 'seems': 0.23; 'component': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'least': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'job:': 0.29; 'motivation': 0.29; 'thread,': 0.29; 'code:': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'that.': 0.30; 'creating': 0.30; 'statement': 0.32; 'functions.': 0.35; 'quite': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'tool': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'names': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'subject:with': 0.40; 'replying': 0.61; 'reach': 0.61; 'here.': 0.62; 'making': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; "they're": 0.66; '_o__)': 0.84; 'for;': 0.84; 'premise': 0.84; 'received:125': 0.84; 'suspicion': 0.84; "they'd": 0.84; 'widespread': 0.91; 'thing,': 0.93; 'hong': 0.96; 'kong': 0.96 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | jigong.madmonks.org |
| X-Public-Key-ID | 0xAC128405 |
| X-Public-Key-Fingerprint | 517C F14B B2F3 98B0 CB35 4855 B8B2 4C06 AC12 8405 |
| X-Public-Key-URL | http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-pubkey.asc |
| X-Post-From | Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au> |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.22 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <8537nsvmbc.fsf@benfinney.id.au> |
| X-Mailman-Original-References | <85mvm5vrbw.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mailman.61.1467090177.2358.python-list@python.org> <0690f476-95ad-4dec-87e5-42ecee07fdcd@googlegroups.com> <nl2hh5$ar7$1@ger.gmane.org> <87poqx96ul.fsf@handshake.de> <mailman.153.1467356702.2358.python-list@python.org> <87bn2h85rn.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:110926 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> writes: > By replying I'm not accepting the premise -- I have no idea if there > is widespread fear and suspicion of lambdas among Python users but it > seems unlikely. I can testify, as the person who started this thread, that there is no fear or suspicion of lambda here. I use it quite frequently without qualm for creating self-explanatory functions that need no name. Rather, the motivation was that a complex thing, with many moving parts, has an unexplained implementation: a nested set of functions without names to explain their part in the pattern. That these are then immediately bound to a name, to me defeats the purpose of using lambda in the first place. If you want a named function, lambda is not the tool to reach for; we have the ‘def’ statement for that. But by using ‘lambda’ the author avoided one of the more important parts of publishing the code: making it readable and self-explanatory. If they'd chosen a name for each function, that would at least have prompted them to explain what they're doing. So ‘lambda’ is great, and I use it without worry for creating simple self-explanatory nameless functions. But it's not the right tool for this job: This is not self-explanatory, and the component functions should not be nameless. -- \ “It is forbidden to steal hotel towels. Please if you are not | `\ person to do such is please not to read notice.” —hotel, | _o__) Kowloon, Hong Kong | Ben Finney
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-06-28 15:02 +1000
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-27 23:08 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-28 18:39 +1000
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 19:43 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-30 13:49 +1000
Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-06-30 09:25 +0200
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 00:43 -0700
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-30 18:00 +1000
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-06-30 10:41 +0200
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2016-07-01 09:04 +0200
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-01 21:25 +0100
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-07-02 11:52 +1000
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2016-07-02 08:57 +0200
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-07-02 18:00 +1000
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 19:50 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 15:08 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 23:09 -0600
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 23:40 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-02 22:48 -0600
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-02 22:37 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 05:52 -0600
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 14:17 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 16:38 -0600
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 16:25 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 09:39 +1000
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 16:59 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 10:06 +1000
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 17:23 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 18:01 -0600
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 17:06 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 18:20 -0600
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-07-02 15:32 +1000
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 23:53 -0600
csiph-web