Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #66400
| From | "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: decimal numbers |
| Date | 2014-02-15 12:04 +0200 |
| References | <833583c7-c307-4ebf-9a60-3be146a565b5@googlegroups.com> <ec88852e-1384-4aa5-834b-85135be94ab9@googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.6976.1392458669.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
"Luke Geelen" <luke.geelen@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ec88852e-1384-4aa5-834b-85135be94ab9@googlegroups.com... > Op zaterdag 15 februari 2014 10:18:36 UTC+1 schreef Luke Geelen: > hello, > > i have been working on a python resistor calculator to let my class show > what you can do with python. > > now i have a script that makes the more speekable value of the resistance > (res) > [...] > > i commented it because it doesn't work (yet), when i have a resistance of > > 9.9 Giga ohms it says it is 9 giga ohms. it seems to work with natural > number, anyway of using decimals insted so that it says : the resistance > is 9.9 Giga Ohms instead of 9 ? > You don't say which version of python you are using. If you are using python2, an integer divided by an integer always returns an integer - >>> 10/3 3 It was changed in python3 to return a float - >>> 10/3 3.3333333333333335 You can reproduce the python3 behaviour in python2 by adding a 'future' directive - >>> from __future__ import division >>> 10/3 3.3333333333333335 HTH Frank Millman
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
decimal numbers luke.geelen@gmail.com - 2014-02-15 01:18 -0800
Re: decimal numbers Luke Geelen <luke.geelen@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 01:19 -0800
Re: decimal numbers "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2014-02-15 12:04 +0200
Re: decimal numbers Luke Geelen <luke.geelen@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 02:32 -0800
Re: decimal numbers "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2014-02-15 12:49 +0200
Re: decimal numbers Luke Geelen <luke.geelen@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 09:17 -0800
Re: decimal numbers Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 10:23 -0700
Re: decimal numbers Luke Geelen <luke.geelen@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 09:42 -0800
Re: decimal numbers Luke Geelen <luke.geelen@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 10:57 -0800
Re: decimal numbers Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-15 19:06 +0000
Re: decimal numbers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-02-15 19:43 +0000
Re: decimal numbers Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 14:34 -0700
Re: decimal numbers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-02-16 02:30 +0000
Re: decimal numbers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-16 13:36 +1100
Re: decimal numbers "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2014-02-15 12:56 +0200
Re: decimal numbers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 21:13 +1100
Re: decimal numbers Laurent Pointal <laurent.pointal@free.fr> - 2014-02-15 15:52 +0100
Re: decimal numbers Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 10:20 -0700
Re: decimal numbers wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-02-16 04:19 -0800
csiph-web