Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #66327
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: A curious bit of code... |
| Date | 2014-02-14 21:01 +0000 |
| References | <4cc09129-43ee-4205-a24c-03f92b594abc@googlegroups.com> <839842ff-e0d4-4bec-93fa-b8c25b3ca471@googlegroups.com> <mailman.6906.1392348429.18130.python-list@python.org> <6940c818-e8dc-483e-8795-9e5493050e3b@googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.6936.1392411730.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 14/02/2014 20:04, forman.simon@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, February 13, 2014 7:26:48 PM UTC-8, Ned Batchelder wrote: >> On 2/13/14 9:45 PM, forman.simon@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> For the record I wasn't worried about the performance. ;-) >> >>> >> >>> It was for Tkinter event strings not markup tags. >> >>> >> >>> I'm glad this was the time winner! >> >>> >> >>> "key and key[0] == '<' and key[-1] == '>'" >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Cheers to the folks who did the timings (and saved me from the trouble!) >> >>> >> >>> Last but not least... s[::len(s)-1] omg!!? ;-D >> >>> >> >> >> >> If you aren't worried about performance, why are you choosing your code >> >> based on which is the fastest? There are other characteristics >> >> (clarity, flexibility, robustness, ...) that could be more useful. > > > I guess I'm taking the word "worried" a little too seriously. > > Back story: I am hoping to contribute to IDLE and am reading the code as a first step. I came across that line of code (BTW, I was wrong: it is NOT processing Tkinter event strings but rather special "<pyshell#...> entries" in linecache.cache [1]) and had to resist the urge to change it to something more readable (to me.) But when I thought about it I wasn't able to discern if any of the new versions would actually be enough of an improvement to justify changing it. > > To be clear: I have no intention of modifying the IDLE codebase just for fairly trivial points like this one line. > > The most satisfying (to me) of the possibilities is "if key and key[0] == '<' and key[-1] == '>':" in the dimensions, if you will, of readability and, uh, unsurprising-ness, and so I was pleased to learn that that was also the fastest. > > > (FWIW, it seems to me that whoever wrote that line was influenced by shell programming. It's a shell sort of a trick to my eye.) > > > When writing Python code I *do* value "clarity, flexibility, robustness" and almost never worry about performance unless something is actually slow in a way that affects something.. > > Warm regards, > ~Simon > > > [1] http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/3a1db0d2747e/Lib/idlelib/PyShell.py#l117 > Pleased to have you on board, as I'm know that Terry Reedy et al can do with a helping hand. But please note you appear to be using google groups, hence the double line spacing above and trying to reply to paragraphs that run as a single line across the screen. Therefore would you please read and action this https://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython, thanks. -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A curious bit of code... forman.simon@gmail.com - 2014-02-13 10:37 -0800
Re: A curious bit of code... Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-13 13:45 -0500
Re: A curious bit of code... Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-02-13 10:45 -0800
Re: A curious bit of code... Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-13 19:09 +0000
Re: A curious bit of code... Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2014-02-13 20:05 +0100
Re: A curious bit of code... Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2014-02-13 19:17 +0000
Re: A curious bit of code... Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-02-13 11:20 -0800
Re: A curious bit of code... Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-13 14:28 -0500
Re: A curious bit of code... Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-02-13 11:25 -0800
Re: A curious bit of code... Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2014-02-13 19:25 +0000
Re: A curious bit of code... Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-13 19:32 +0000
Re: A curious bit of code... Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-02-13 20:43 +0100
Re: A curious bit of code... Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-13 21:56 +0200
Re: A curious bit of code... Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-02-13 11:23 -0800
Re: A curious bit of code... Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2014-02-13 19:51 +0000
Re: A curious bit of code... Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-02-13 11:59 -0800
Re: A curious bit of code... Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2014-02-13 13:59 -0600
Re: A curious bit of code... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-14 07:29 +1100
Re: A curious bit of code... Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-02-13 14:39 -0600
Re: A curious bit of code... Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2014-02-13 12:55 -0800
Re: A curious bit of code... Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-13 16:24 -0500
Re: A curious bit of code... Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-02-13 16:23 -0800
Re: A curious bit of code... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-14 08:01 +1100
Re: A curious bit of code... Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2014-02-13 21:01 +0000
Re: A curious bit of code... Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-02-13 22:06 +0100
Re: A curious bit of code... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-14 08:10 +1100
Re: A curious bit of code... Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-13 21:14 +0000
Re: A curious bit of code... Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2014-02-13 15:20 -0600
Re: A curious bit of code... Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2014-02-13 15:19 -0600
Re: A curious bit of code... Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2014-02-13 13:23 -0800
Re: A curious bit of code... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-14 08:31 +1100
Re: A curious bit of code... Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-13 16:38 -0500
Re: A curious bit of code... Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2014-02-13 15:47 -0600
Re: A curious bit of code... Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2014-02-13 23:49 +0200
Re: A curious bit of code... Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-13 16:51 -0500
Re: A curious bit of code... Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-02-13 13:33 -0800
Re: A curious bit of code... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-14 09:13 +1100
Re: A curious bit of code... Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-02-13 14:26 -0800
Re: A curious bit of code... Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-02-13 19:29 -0500
Re: A curious bit of code... forman.simon@gmail.com - 2014-02-13 18:45 -0800
Re: A curious bit of code... Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-02-13 22:26 -0500
Re: A curious bit of code... forman.simon@gmail.com - 2014-02-14 12:04 -0800
Re: A curious bit of code... Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-14 21:01 +0000
Re: A curious bit of code... Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-02-14 07:19 -0500
Re: A curious bit of code... Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-14 09:06 -0500
csiph-web