Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #96749

Re: Packaging and deployment of standalone Python applications?

Subject Re: Packaging and deployment of standalone Python applications?
References <7360db29-ba81-4b84-99eb-dbeca2a888b8@googlegroups.com> <CAJ4+4aqUh5hDis=31XxD2DS_mHv8q08zwFBAxG_NDThv-979Tw@mail.gmail.com> <55F9C313.8040202@gmail.com> <201509162219.t8GMJQeI024717@fido.openend.se>
From Kristian Rink <kawazu428@gmail.com>
Date 2015-09-17 08:23 +0200
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.686.1442473629.8327.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Laura;

and first off, thanks bunches for your comment.

Am 17.09.2015 um 00:19 schrieb Laura Creighton:
 >
> Your problem is likely with the shared library search paths.
> Different distributions put them in different places.  It's a real
> pain, and the reason why docker is getting more popular.

Well I thought something like this but then again wondered whether this 
really would be the cause - after all, Thunderbird, Firefox, OpenOffice, 
Java and a bunch of other applications that are available as "binary" 
downloads for "generic Linux" do seem to work on RedHat/CentOS, Debian, 
Ubuntu without these issues. Are these all statically built? Would this 
be an option for distributing Python applications, as well?

Or, other option: Would it work to, say, use venv, make sure there 
always is a Python of the same version on the target machine installed 
(say 3.4), and then distribute "just" the python parts without including 
the interpreter / binary itself?

Thanks in advance and all the best,
Kristian

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Packaging and deployment of standalone Python applications? Kristian Rink <kawazu428@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 23:58 -0700
  Re: Packaging and deployment of standalone Python applications? dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2015-09-15 07:46 +0200
  Re: Packaging and deployment of standalone Python applications? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-09-15 08:17 +0200
  Re: Packaging and deployment of standalone Python applications? marco.nawijn@colosso.nl - 2015-09-15 04:25 -0700
    Re: Packaging and deployment of standalone Python applications? Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-09-15 14:04 +0200
  Re: Packaging and deployment of standalone Python applications? Kristian Rink <kawazu428@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 21:29 +0200
    Re: Packaging and deployment of standalone Python applications? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-09-17 09:24 +0200
      Re: Packaging and deployment of standalone Python applications? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 17:38 +1000
  Re: Packaging and deployment of standalone Python applications? Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-09-17 00:19 +0200
  Re: Packaging and deployment of standalone Python applications? Kristian Rink <kawazu428@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 08:23 +0200
  Re: Packaging and deployment of standalone Python applications? Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-09-17 11:06 +0200
  Re: Packaging and deployment of standalone Python applications? m <mvoicem@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:39 +0200
  Re: Packaging and deployment of standalone Python applications? Kristian Rink <kawazu428@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:36 +0200

csiph-web