Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #66202

Re: singleton ... again

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!takemy.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.048
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.91; '*S*': 0.01; 'one?': 0.05; 'represents': 0.05; 'false,': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'changes': 0.15; 'drastic': 0.16; 'received:69.93': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'singleton': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'port.': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'correct': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'besides': 0.30; 'assert': 0.31; 'reflected': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'computer.': 0.33; 'objects': 0.35; 'operations': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'false': 0.36; 'instances': 0.36; 'charset :us-ascii': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'skip:p 20': 0.39; 'tell': 0.60; 'received:173': 0.61; 'refer': 0.63; 'between': 0.67; 'smith': 0.68; 'physical': 0.72; 'serial': 0.72; 'article': 0.77; 'ethan': 0.84; 'furman': 0.84; 'received:gateway02.websitewelcome.com': 0.91; 'why?': 0.91; 'differences': 0.93; 'ports': 0.93
Date Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:31:12 -0800
From Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: singleton ... again
References <fdbb58a7-87c0-4a2f-bedf-f8e3e14fa356@googlegroups.com> <mailman.6728.1392183929.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-11BAB5.00555912022014@news.panix.com> <bm0v9iFpuquU1@mid.individual.net> <mailman.6750.1392199807.18130.python-list@python.org> <m2a9dvmlos.fsf@cochabamba.vanoostrum.org> <ldibhu$2g5$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.6850.1392313443.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-640027.12574313022014@news.panix.com>
In-Reply-To <roy-640027.12574313022014@news.panix.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-AntiAbuse This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse Primary Hostname - gator3304.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse Original Domain - python.org
X-AntiAbuse Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us
X-BWhitelist no
X-Source-IP 173.12.184.233
X-Source
X-Source-Args
X-Source-Dir
X-Source-Sender ([173.12.184.233]) [173.12.184.233]:33794
X-Source-Auth ethan+stoneleaf.us
X-Email-Count 11
X-Source-Cap dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3IzMzA0Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20=
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.6852.1392317509.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 33
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1392317509 news.xs4all.nl 2976 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57338
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:66202

Show key headers only | View raw

On 02/13/2014 09:57 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article <mailman.6850.1392313443.18130.python-list@python.org>,
>   Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
>
>> Say you have a class that represents serial ports or your computer.  You
>> should get the same object every time you ask
>> for SerialPort(2).
>
> Why?  Certainly, you should get objects which refer to the same physical
> port.  So:
>
> port_a = SerialPort(2)
> port_b = SerialPort(2)
>
> port_a.enable()
> assert port_b.is_shutdown() == False
>
> port_a.shutdown()
> assert port_b.is_shutdown() == True
>
> But, why do they have to be the same object?  Why should I care if
>
> port_a is port_b
>
> is False, as long as all operations I perform on either are reflected in
> correct state changes on the other one?

You mean use the Borg pattern instead of the Singleton pattern?  As far as I can tell they are two shades of the same 
thing.  Are there any drastic differences between the two?  Besides one having many instances that share one __dict__ 
and the other just having one instance and one __dict__?

--
~Ethan~

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

singleton ... again Asaf Las <roegltd@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 20:34 -0800
  Re: singleton ... again Asaf Las <roegltd@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 21:15 -0800
  Re:singleton ... again Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-02-12 00:48 -0500
    Re: singleton ... again Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-12 00:55 -0500
      Re: singleton ... again Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-02-12 23:04 +1300
        Re: singleton ... again Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-02-12 21:09 +1100
          Re: singleton ... again Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-12 08:40 -0500
          Re: singleton ... again Piet van Oostrum <piet@vanoostrum.org> - 2014-02-13 10:00 +0100
            Re: singleton ... again Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-02-13 06:50 -0500
            Re: singleton ... again Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-13 22:57 +1100
              Re: singleton ... again Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-13 10:24 -0500
                Re: singleton ... again Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-14 07:03 +1100
                Re: singleton ... again Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2014-02-13 21:13 +0000
                Re: singleton ... again Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-14 08:27 +1100
            Re: singleton ... again Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-02-13 08:57 -0800
              Re: singleton ... again Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-13 12:57 -0500
                Re: singleton ... again Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-02-13 10:31 -0800
                Re: singleton ... again Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-13 14:03 -0500
                Re: singleton ... again Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-14 06:50 +1100
                Re: singleton ... again Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-02-13 22:28 +0000
              Re: singleton ... again Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-02-14 18:21 +1300
            Re: singleton ... again Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney@gmail.com> - 2014-02-14 06:16 +1100
        Re: singleton ... again Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-02-13 02:58 +0000
          Re: singleton ... again Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-02-13 14:07 +1100
            Re: singleton ... again Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-02-13 04:24 +0000
              Re: singleton ... again Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-13 15:33 +1100
              Re: singleton ... again Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-02-14 18:15 +1300
          Re: singleton ... again Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-02-14 18:06 +1300
    Re: singleton ... again Asaf Las <roegltd@gmail.com> - 2014-02-12 09:50 -0800
      Re: singleton ... again Asaf Las <roegltd@gmail.com> - 2014-02-12 09:56 -0800
        Re: singleton ... again Asaf Las <roegltd@gmail.com> - 2014-02-12 09:58 -0800
        Re: singleton ... again Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-02-13 10:57 +1300
          Re: singleton ... again Asaf Las <roegltd@gmail.com> - 2014-02-12 17:38 -0800
      Re: singleton ... again Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-12 18:57 +0000
        Re: singleton ... again Asaf Las <roegltd@gmail.com> - 2014-02-12 17:02 -0800
      Re: singleton ... again Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-02-12 16:34 -0500
        Re: singleton ... again Asaf Las <roegltd@gmail.com> - 2014-02-12 17:34 -0800
      Re: singleton ... again Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney@gmail.com> - 2014-02-13 10:08 +1100
      Re: singleton ... again Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-12 20:57 -0500
  Re: singleton ... again Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-02-12 15:05 -0700

csiph-web