Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #96987

Re: A little test for you Guys😜

Path csiph.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!nzpost1.xs4all.net!not-for-mail
Return-Path <srkunze@mail.de>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.006
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; '"""': 0.05; 'subject:test': 0.07; 'http,': 0.09; 'none.': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'output': 0.13; 'def': 0.13; 'variables': 0.15; '"%s': 0.16; '"hello': 0.16; "'s')": 0.16; ':-p': 0.16; 'dictionaries': 0.16; 'ftp,': 0.16; 'iterators': 0.16; 'pep8': 0.16; 'traceback.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'input': 0.18; '%s"': 0.22; 'decorator': 0.22; 'code.': 0.23; 'leave': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'distribute': 0.27; 'define': 0.27; 'not.': 0.27; 'question': 0.27; 'yield': 0.27; 'function': 0.28; '**kwargs)': 0.29; '**kwargs):': 0.29; 'prints': 0.29; 'program,': 0.29; 'print': 0.30; 'code': 0.30; 'source': 0.33; 'decorators': 0.33; 'received:10.0': 0.34; 'lists': 0.34; 'so,': 0.35; 'best,': 0.35; 'could': 0.35; 'propose': 0.35; 'skip:p 30': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:10': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'method': 0.37; 'end': 0.39; 'why': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'received:de': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'questions': 0.40; 'provide': 0.61; 'is.': 0.63; 'different': 0.63; 'python-list': 0.66; 'here': 0.66; 'subjectcharset:utf-8': 0.71; 'mail,': 0.72; 'decorate': 0.84; 'f(*args,': 0.84; 'subject:you': 0.85
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mail.de; s=mail201212; t=1442950963; bh=5cRABcd7uzDlFCJr1sZfVTuPkW20t2tKRi8h2umg4p4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dSSMWvz+XpyTKtvPQWBwQGfjWTpOu+v/DZsRaGk/BhOHqO6kG3K+qhcEW2/uSOc+i tVK++zIqQ+sMFKGG46L7/6T8FnpmPADoHW1hy5wYQMZRcp/9/TlyIzARtOQ4INOcVe vspRe6i2F12tCKng7iEPNyINe6TBtusaaFLEIVmY=
Date Tue, 22 Sep 2015 21:42:41 +0200
From "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: A little test for you Guys😜
References <78fc66f6-04f9-4b84-8410-2e74fb75fbb4@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To <78fc66f6-04f9-4b84-8410-2e74fb75fbb4@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-purgate clean
X-purgate This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-type clean
X-purgate-Ad Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate clean
X-purgate-size 2243
X-purgate-ID 154282::1442950963-00000883-542B066B/0/0
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.68.1442950966.28679.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 107
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1442950966 news.xs4all.nl 23795 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60976
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:96987

Show key headers only | View raw


Hmm, why not. :D

On 22.09.2015 20:43, Python_Teacher via Python-list wrote:
> you have 10 minutes😂 Good luck!!
>
>
> 1. What is PEP8 ?

A PEP.

> 2. What are the different ways to distribute some python source code ?

unison, rsync, scp, ftp, sftp, samba, http, https, mail, git, ....

> 2 Lists
>
> Let's define the function plural :
>
> def plural(words):
>      plurals = []
>      for word in words:
>         plurals.append(word + 's')
>      return plurals
>
> for word in plural(['cabagge','owl','toy']):
>      print word
>
> Question : How could the code of the function plural be optimised?

Don't optimized until you need to. So, we leave it as is. ;)

> 3 Dictionaries
>
> Here are two dictionnaries :
>
> input = {
>      'foo1': 'bar1',
>      'chose': 'truc',
>      'foo2': 'bar2',
> }
> output = {
>      'bar1': 'foo1',
>      'truc': 'chose',
>      'bar2': 'foo2'
> }
>
> Question : Propose a function that returns output when you provide input ?

# :-P
def function(input):
     return output

> 4 Iterators
>
> Let's consider this program :
>
> def program_1():
>      yield 1
>      yield 2
>      yield 3
>
> g = program_1()
> a = list(g)
> b = list(g)
> c = g()
>
> Question : At the end of the program,
>
> 1. What is the type of g ?
> 2. What is the value of a ?
> 3. What is the value of b ?
> 4. What is the value of c ?

The program ends with a traceback. So, my variables are all gone. :(

> 5 Decorators
>
> Let's consider now :
>
> def str2print(f):
>      def str2print_wrap(*args, **kwargs):
>          """wrapper"""
>          s = f(*args, **kwargs)
>          print s
>     return str2print_wrap
>
> def hello(s):
>      """ Return "Hello $s" """
>      return "%s %s" % ("Hello", s)
>
> Questions :
>
> 1. Decorate the method 'hello' with 'str2printf' and write the corresponding code.

@str2print
def hello(s):
     """ Return "Hello $s" but actually returns None """
     return "%s %s" % ("Hello", s)


> 2. What is the effect of the decorator on a call to the new method 'hello' ?
It prints "Hello {s}" and returns None.
> 3. What is the return value of hello.__doc__
'wrapper'

Best,
Sven

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

A little test for you Guys😜 Python_Teacher <ljfc2000@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-22 11:43 -0700
  Re: A little test for you Guys😜 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 13:14 -0600
  Re: A little test for you Guys😜 "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2015-09-22 21:42 +0200
  Re: A little test for you Guys😜 Akira Li <4kir4.1i@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 22:48 +0300
  Re: A little test for you Guys😜 James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 13:28 -0700
  Re: A little test for you Guys😜 sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-09-22 14:18 -0700
    Re: A little test for you Guys😜 "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 22:31 +0100
    Re: A little test for you Guys😜 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:33 -0600
    Re: A little test for you Guys😜 Lj Fc <ljfc2000@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-22 15:21 -0700
  Re: A little test for you Guys😜 Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-09-23 00:32 +0100
  Re: A little test for you Guys😜 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 09:45 +1000
  Re: A little test for you Guys😜 MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2015-09-23 00:56 +0100
    Re: A little test for you Guys😜 alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2015-09-23 18:06 +0000
  Re: A little test for you Guys😜 Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-09-23 08:26 +0200

csiph-web