Re: Any built-in ishashable method ?

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<kushal.kumaran@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.058
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.88; 'S': 0.00; '64-bit': 0.07; '32-bit': 0.09; 'subject:method': 0.09; 'infinite)': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'integer': 0.17; 'sender:addr:gmail.com': 0.18; 'fairly': 0.21; 'keys': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'values': 0.26; '(possibly': 0.29; 'behaviour': 0.29; 'hash': 0.29; 'writes:': 0.29; 'subject: ?': 0.30; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'test': 0.36; 'possible': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'kind': 0.61; 'message- id:@mx.google.com': 0.81; 'otten': 0.84; 'subject:Any': 0.84
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=U5yAplINdw9eofzHRINCcrt9q3ILN6i+f5fiYsPbKbk=; b=YuGDvNtQ+mC0hNp9R0+sMNDEiQlzx6qq9fWspv0SSHfD0dsTFpvJX2+20S5TJ//Wgj C3dsn1xUkvaXZf+YQLvpak6B7mQEZye1BenfvcaTjsWX2td2F79LGTLjglmqbqvKxjiX iJEECNrkbn+QqR+2TGOk7vhxHYg2IKedLDKujrWGOoveCfuVKty7aE66xxFRBpbNDNwF zEK3qGMXhr7XMw6pgO8sIAZRwaxYMISGEM+RK+YyLDYxdu67p6ivV8jc/etiFzkmcIKS s59HBHarr+gG6xkQTooxX1kRifkhbQX6NsMB2J10liW2lmm1d8vl9tcGSn8+nGKP7U53 LLiA==
X-Received	by 10.68.241.232 with SMTP id wl8mr10291228pbc.144.1358559399455; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:36:39 -0800 (PST)
Sender	Kushal Kumaran <kushal.kumaran@gmail.com>
From	Kushal Kumaran <kushal.kumaran+python@gmail.com>
To	python-list@python.org
Subject	Re: Any built-in ishashable method ?
In-Reply-To	<kdbdr4$7fl$1@ger.gmane.org>
References	<kdbb94$hqa$1@ger.gmane.org> <627444785.6706139.1358510169194.JavaMail.root@sequans.com> <kdbdr4$7fl$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent	Notmuch/0.14 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date	Sat, 19 Jan 2013 07:06:32 +0530
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.659.1358559831.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	20
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1358559831 news.xs4all.nl 6856 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54359
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:37042

Show key headers only | View raw

Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> writes:

> Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
>
>> That brings me to another question, is there any valid test case where
>> key1 != key2 and hash(key1) == hash(key2) ? Or is it some kind of design
>> flaw ?
>
> I don't think there is a use case for such a behaviour other than annoying 
> your collegues ;)
>

It's fairly common.  The set of possible keys can be much larger
(possibly infinite) than the set of possible hash values (restricted to
32-bit or 64-bit integer values, afaict).

-- 
regards,
kushal

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Any built-in ishashable method ? Kushal Kumaran <kushal.kumaran+python@gmail.com> - 2013-01-19 07:06 +0530

csiph-web