Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #94019
| Date | 2015-07-17 10:32 -0700 |
|---|---|
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| Subject | Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function |
| References | <CAPTjJmq7_sG+HmMCBPWq2A3GQFPix-OjUTCu+yAmWiJmEFy6PA@mail.gmail.com> <55A8AC13.8070803@rece.vub.ac.be> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.652.1437154384.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 07/17/2015 12:17 AM, Antoon Pardon wrote: > On 07/17/2015 01:46 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> Open for bikeshedding: What should the keyword be? We can't use >> "exec", which would match Unix and shell usage, because it's already >> used in a rather different sense in Python. Current candidates: >> "transfer", "goto", "recurse", and anything else you suggest. > > I propose the combination "return from". +1 -- ~Ethan~
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-07-17 10:32 -0700
csiph-web