Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #112116

Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Random832 <random832@fastmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?
Date Sat, 30 Jul 2016 23:51:31 -0400
Lines 34
Message-ID <mailman.64.1469937095.6033.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <b80ae0ca-d8b2-4430-96a1-7a6768b177ef@googlegroups.com> <87vazwppxx.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <CAPTjJmotJBomzHRR4bY04mVFwgMWAUp_7HDhJyd2v+jHYmnGjQ@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.74.1469273692.22221.python-list@python.org> <nmvt9g$nj6$1@dont-email.me> <CAPTjJmqjaLOZLiBHG2ADrsHmOwdAsEfAHQ1vDwDpMTM+GU=zzg@mail.gmail.com> <579B1ABB.1070500@rece.vub.ac.be> <nngbk6$vce$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.36.1469821397.6033.python-list@python.org> <nngdns$um1$1@dont-email.me> <579c2095$0$22142$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <nnhuni$op$1@dont-email.me> <CAPTjJmq7caLKiimgEt_HbhSNcyv+c6_+8sF_odcGx6yoCUjizA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.43.1469877947.6033.python-list@python.org> <c6df24e3-3f4f-43be-be18-bc9eaa91606b@googlegroups.com> <579cbded$0$1605$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <758a1961-00bc-4b1c-834b-a7deca94d029@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmpfBZX7JjyxaFkmWLnd9m0dF-qN_wndzra_5Ozyx0JY9g@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.56.1469896666.6033.python-list@python.org> <e053i3F9kf6U1@mid.individual.net> <CAPTjJmo1fkFQdMUWo6yEc9MaLZMvZqpso+0QXw24-xEEm7erdg@mail.gmail.com> <1469937091.1073724.681536537.7B23B6E2@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de jIuygfCSdNKDgkKTHSefag+s4rZcr6Qceq6jDL/6ZXQA==
Return-Path <random832@fastmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'static': 0.03; '"as': 0.07; 'statically': 0.07; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'api': 0.09; 'merged': 0.09; 'none"': 0.09; 'received:internal': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'typed': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'subject:not': 0.11; 'syntax': 0.13; 'argument': 0.15; 'languages.': 0.15; '"always': 0.16; 'distinction': 0.16; 'general.': 0.16; 'message- id:@webmail.messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'personally,': 0.16; 'received:10.202': 0.16; 'received:10.202.2': 0.16; 'received:10.202.2.212': 0.16; 'received:66.111': 0.16; 'received:66.111.4': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:allow': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'typing': 0.18; 'int,': 0.22; 'decide': 0.23; 'sat,': 0.23; '(this': 0.24; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'all.': 0.24; "doesn't": 0.26; '(which': 0.26; 'chris': 0.26; 'function': 0.28; 'values': 0.28; 'callable': 0.29; 'does,': 0.29; 'objects': 0.29; 'url:mailman': 0.30; "can't": 0.32; 'url:python': 0.33; 'url:listinfo': 0.34; 'languages': 0.34; 'functions.': 0.35; 'returning': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'keyword': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:10': 0.37; 'really': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'difference': 0.38; 'received:66': 0.38; 'mean': 0.38; 'end': 0.39; 'means': 0.39; 'rather': 0.39; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'called': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'care': 0.60; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.61; 'default': 0.61; '30,': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'different': 0.63; 'between': 0.65; 'fall': 0.66; 'fundamental': 0.66; 'statement,': 0.66; 'jul': 0.72; 'special': 0.73; '(once': 0.84; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'distinguish': 0.84; 'kind.': 0.91; 'spell': 0.91
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=s3a0A6KGZ0UENb/cj17XqJpCwBs=; b=I48vD4 RknruW8AO+Xi3NJdWGipFqcfnRT/inW6eNqOTPDDUNmWbbG7Pg5kq35uNs3tDQed 4Cf4OFYi5nAWKIfuhnc3Bxa9J2O1o3768E4pjEApSiIt95dkpWer838b1EVqXhX/ Ip1iX8Pv4gx6WmXLbOMPv4hUK0ejZqXJRDYaA=
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=s3a0A6KGZ0UENb/ cj17XqJpCwBs=; b=Q8tXYXhhSaCpK+gLH4pCRKDjmgQd6MR9toBNLdnvO4XK3kT K46q4DCYweqvu2SnnYF1fVFsS6wqMte4M4FaZF250UUAPp6c0YmDqPDw5IvfuZwJ yr7rbzz8XDjFYgjs/jaCgEmPsKMJ+CFIPb1izBVca5mrpGuT+uh2FQ32nd5E=
X-Sasl-Enc +9iH2gQFYZPvdmOn8w7eQAIKYtX9tDGfFxBToy0+jPQe 1469937091
X-Mailer MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-501c3c37
In-Reply-To <CAPTjJmo1fkFQdMUWo6yEc9MaLZMvZqpso+0QXw24-xEEm7erdg@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <1469937091.1073724.681536537.7B23B6E2@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <b80ae0ca-d8b2-4430-96a1-7a6768b177ef@googlegroups.com> <87vazwppxx.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <CAPTjJmotJBomzHRR4bY04mVFwgMWAUp_7HDhJyd2v+jHYmnGjQ@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.74.1469273692.22221.python-list@python.org> <nmvt9g$nj6$1@dont-email.me> <CAPTjJmqjaLOZLiBHG2ADrsHmOwdAsEfAHQ1vDwDpMTM+GU=zzg@mail.gmail.com> <579B1ABB.1070500@rece.vub.ac.be> <nngbk6$vce$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.36.1469821397.6033.python-list@python.org> <nngdns$um1$1@dont-email.me> <579c2095$0$22142$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <nnhuni$op$1@dont-email.me> <CAPTjJmq7caLKiimgEt_HbhSNcyv+c6_+8sF_odcGx6yoCUjizA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.43.1469877947.6033.python-list@python.org> <c6df24e3-3f4f-43be-be18-bc9eaa91606b@googlegroups.com> <579cbded$0$1605$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <758a1961-00bc-4b1c-834b-a7deca94d029@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmpfBZX7JjyxaFkmWLnd9m0dF-qN_wndzra_5Ozyx0JY9g@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.56.1469896666.6033.python-list@python.org> <e053i3F9kf6U1@mid.individual.net> <CAPTjJmo1fkFQdMUWo6yEc9MaLZMvZqpso+0QXw24-xEEm7erdg@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:112116

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016, at 22:17, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Yeah. The distinction means you have a fundamental API difference
> between the procedures (which don't return anything) and the functions
> (whose return values you mightn't care about).

Not really any more than between functions returning different types -
which python doesn't distinguish in general. That some languages may
spell it with a different keyword rather than a special type [such as
C's void] doesn't mean the fundamental API difference is of a different
kind.

> It means you can't
> upgrade something from "always returns None" to "returns the number of
> objects frobbed" without breaking compat. 

Well, that's something you can't do in general in statically typed
languages. (Once upon a time, C had a default return type of int, and
allowed functions returning it to fall off the end or have a "return;"
statement, but not anymore).

This is ultimately just the static typing argument in miniature,
confused by the fact that some languages declare them with a different
syntax from other functions.

> Conversely, if you decide
> that any function can be called "as a procedure" (this is what REXX
> does, for instance), then you've just merged the two types of callable
> and distinguished them only in usage.
> 
> Personally, I don't see any value to the distinction at all.
> 
> ChrisA
> -- 
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why not allow empty code blocks? Kent Tong <kent.tong.mo@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 08:33 -0700
  Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2016-07-22 16:44 +0000
  Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-23 11:49 +1000
    Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Kent Tong <kent.tong.mo@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 19:06 -0700
    Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-23 14:13 +0300
      Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 21:34 +1000
        Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-23 14:49 +0300
        Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-23 15:00 +0100
          Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 00:19 +1000
          Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-29 10:58 +0200
          Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-29 07:14 -0400
            Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-29 14:15 +0100
              Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 07:41 -0600
              Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-29 23:43 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-29 15:55 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-30 00:38 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-29 20:32 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-30 13:49 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-08-02 09:31 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-29 12:28 -0400
              Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-29 12:20 -0400
          Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-29 15:46 +0200
          Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-07-29 15:43 -0400
            Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-29 21:19 +0100
              Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-30 01:01 +0300
              Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-30 13:35 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 11:15 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 21:25 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 04:39 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 21:49 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 05:11 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 22:22 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 05:31 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 22:44 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 01:07 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 13:39 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 22:47 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 22:47 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 13:27 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 22:34 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 00:58 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 00:47 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 09:15 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 09:29 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 03:53 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 12:16 -0600
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-31 13:37 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 19:34 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 13:14 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 20:34 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:12 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 23:42 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-30 22:10 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-31 19:39 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-31 10:51 +0300
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 01:18 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 06:51 -0600
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 09:23 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 01:14 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-01 03:06 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 10:32 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 02:37 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 09:58 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 03:15 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 10:48 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-31 13:45 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 12:17 +1000
                Procedures and functions [was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?] Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 13:32 +1000
                Re: Procedures and functions [was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?] "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-31 00:01 -0400
                Re: Procedures and functions [was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?] Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 16:40 +1000
                Re: Procedures and functions [was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?] Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 23:47 -0700
                Re: Procedures and functions [was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 16:55 +1000
                Re: Procedures and functions [was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:05 +1000
                Re: Procedures and functions [was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?] Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-31 00:26 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-30 23:51 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:21 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 21:22 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-08-02 12:30 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 05:29 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-08-03 10:26 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 04:48 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-08-03 15:09 +0300
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 05:23 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 05:27 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-08-03 15:37 +0300
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 05:43 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-08-03 15:34 +0300
                {non sequitur/bad humor} was: Why not allow empty code blocks? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-03 18:01 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 02:43 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-30 23:06 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 23:36 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 14:58 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 01:48 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 02:34 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 19:46 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 12:10 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-30 23:41 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-31 11:18 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-01 01:31 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-31 12:39 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bart4858@gmail.com - 2016-07-31 17:11 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 10:21 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 17:55 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 11:10 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 19:09 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 12:14 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bart4858@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 00:55 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-31 22:08 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-07-31 21:29 -0400
                Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-07-31 14:58 -0400
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-02 12:05 +0100
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 00:58 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-02 18:12 +0100
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Steven D'Aprano <steve+python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-03 03:57 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-02 20:14 +0100
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-03 15:43 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-03 11:16 +0100
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 23:18 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Steven D'Aprano <steve+python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-04 13:23 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-04 10:13 +0100
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 19:39 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-04 19:38 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-08-04 14:37 -0400
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 04:54 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 05:18 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2016-08-02 21:55 +0200
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 06:50 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-08-02 17:27 -0400
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-02 14:54 -0700
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-02 23:38 +0100
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 05:03 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-31 15:12 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:07 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 15:16 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 02:08 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 02:10 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-31 15:10 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-30 10:39 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 16:14 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-30 13:11 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 19:15 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2016-08-01 00:25 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-31 11:53 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2016-08-03 23:38 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-31 12:04 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 09:27 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2016-08-02 01:30 +1000
                Using valid emails "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-08-01 12:05 -0400
                Re: Using valid emails Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 02:22 +1000
                Re: Using valid emails Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-08-01 22:16 +0300
                Re: Using valid emails "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-08-01 12:40 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-08-01 22:14 +0300
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-31 19:41 +0300
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-01 03:22 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "Jan Erik Moström" <lists@mostrom.pp.se> - 2016-07-31 20:58 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:01 -0600
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bart4858@gmail.com - 2016-07-31 16:43 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 09:49 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bart4858@gmail.com - 2016-07-31 17:21 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 10:33 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bart4858@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 01:05 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-08-01 09:50 +0000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bart4858@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 06:26 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-01 20:12 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bart4858@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 06:19 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bartc <bart4858@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 13:22 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 06:28 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-02 17:56 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve+python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-03 03:54 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 05:10 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-02 20:19 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 19:38 +0000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? lists@juliensalort.org (Julien Salort) - 2016-08-02 21:45 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve+python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-03 03:50 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-02 12:22 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 03:02 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-03 18:58 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 05:16 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 22:36 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-03 14:04 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 23:25 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 14:06 +0000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-08-03 20:40 +0000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-03 14:23 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 23:31 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-03 19:52 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 06:12 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-03 21:53 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 07:39 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-03 23:21 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 08:31 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-04 00:51 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-03 16:25 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-04 00:48 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-08-01 09:40 +0000
                Using valid emails "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-08-01 12:32 -0400
                Re: Using valid emails Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 12:38 -0600
                Re: Using valid emails "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-08-01 15:27 -0400
        Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2016-07-28 20:01 +0000
          Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 06:11 +1000
      Detecting the trivial can be non-trivial (was Why not allow empty code blocks?) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 05:28 -0700
        Re: Detecting the trivial can be non-trivial (was Why not allow empty code blocks?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-24 11:15 +0100
          Re: Detecting the trivial can be non-trivial (was Why not allow empty code blocks?) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 07:49 -0700
      Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-23 08:29 -0400
        Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-23 16:13 +0300
          Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-23 09:54 -0400
            Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-23 15:06 +0100
              Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-24 01:55 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 11:35 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 11:45 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 21:27 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 14:09 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 23:24 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 15:05 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-25 00:32 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-25 12:40 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-25 02:14 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-07-25 11:45 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 09:54 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 03:02 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 10:11 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 03:26 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 19:43 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 20:48 -0600
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 13:12 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 20:20 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 13:28 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 20:46 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-25 17:20 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-25 14:27 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? neceros@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 11:27 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-24 22:17 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 08:28 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 22:48 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 23:38 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marco Sulla <mail.python.org@marco.sulla.e4ward.com> - 2016-07-24 15:11 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 15:44 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 00:51 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 19:14 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Jonathan Hayward <jonathan.hayward@pobox.com> - 2016-07-24 13:34 -0500
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-07-24 18:52 +0000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 05:00 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 21:03 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 07:08 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 23:13 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-25 13:04 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-25 10:44 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-26 19:21 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-26 10:56 +0300
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-26 20:35 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-26 11:11 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-25 12:37 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-25 11:39 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-26 19:23 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-25 10:36 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-25 18:33 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 17:56 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-26 16:31 +0200

csiph-web