Re: init is the initialiser

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<cameron@cskk.homeip.net>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.015
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.97; 'S': 0.00; '__init__': 0.09; 'constructor': 0.09; 'question.': 0.14; '[by': 0.16; '__new__': 0.16; 'conflicting': 0.16; 'finney': 0.16; 'fits': 0.16; 'from:addr:cs': 0.16; 'from:addr:zip.com.au': 0.16; 'from:name:cameron simpson': 0.16; 'message-id:@cskk.homeip.net': 0.16; 'received:211.29': 0.16; 'received:211.29.132': 0.16; 'received:cskk.homeip.net': 0.16; 'received:homeip.net': 0.16; 'received:optusnet.com.au': 0.16; 'received:syd.optusnet.com.au': 0.16; 'simpson': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'machine': 0.22; 'separate': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'defined': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'asked': 0.31; 'writes:': 0.31; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; "can't": 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'received:com.au': 0.36; 'wrong': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'clear': 0.37; 'ben': 0.38; 'received:211': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'new': 0.61; 'content- disposition:inline': 0.62; 'kind': 0.63; 'such': 0.63; 'skip:\xe2 10': 0.65; 'construction': 0.72; '8bit%:46': 0.78; 'batchelder': 0.84; 'step.': 0.91; 'mr.': 0.98
Date	Sat, 1 Feb 2014 10:18:29 +1100
From	Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
To	python-list@python.org
Subject	Re: __init__ is the initialiser
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition	inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
In-Reply-To	<858utviwgs.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
User-Agent	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
References	<858utviwgs.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
X-Optus-CM-Score	0
X-Optus-CM-Analysis	v=2.1 cv=HZAtEE08 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=YuQlxtEQCowy2cfE5kc7TA==:117 a=YuQlxtEQCowy2cfE5kc7TA==:17 a=ZtCCktOnAAAA:8 a=PO7r1zJSAAAA:8 a=LcaDllckn3IA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=vrnE16BAAAAA:8 a=8AHkEIZyAAAA:8 a=1U9r9e_U-9MA:10 a=W4ub2mWhAAAA:8 a=ZCUwMjD-I379eTjn95gA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=0xq-cdXUTwIA:10
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.6229.1391210314.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	20
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1391210314 news.xs4all.nl 2900 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45029
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:65149

Show key headers only | View raw

On 01Feb2014 10:05, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> writes:
> > Why can't we call __init__ the constructor and __new__ the allocator?
> 
> Because those terms already have meanings, and “__new__” fits the
> meaning of “constructor” better.

+1 on not giving new conflicting meanings to terms already well
defined in practice.

Better just to make in clear in the __init__ docs that there is a
separate construction step.
-- 
Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>

On two occasions I have been asked [by members of Parliament],
'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will
the right answers come out?'  I am not able rightly to apprehend the
kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.
        - Babbage

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: __init__ is the initialiser Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2014-02-01 10:18 +1100

csiph-web