Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #112107

Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?
Date Sun, 31 Jul 2016 12:17:04 +1000
Lines 33
Message-ID <mailman.62.1469931427.6033.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <b80ae0ca-d8b2-4430-96a1-7a6768b177ef@googlegroups.com> <87vazwppxx.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <CAPTjJmotJBomzHRR4bY04mVFwgMWAUp_7HDhJyd2v+jHYmnGjQ@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.74.1469273692.22221.python-list@python.org> <nmvt9g$nj6$1@dont-email.me> <CAPTjJmqjaLOZLiBHG2ADrsHmOwdAsEfAHQ1vDwDpMTM+GU=zzg@mail.gmail.com> <579B1ABB.1070500@rece.vub.ac.be> <nngbk6$vce$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.36.1469821397.6033.python-list@python.org> <nngdns$um1$1@dont-email.me> <579c2095$0$22142$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <nnhuni$op$1@dont-email.me> <CAPTjJmq7caLKiimgEt_HbhSNcyv+c6_+8sF_odcGx6yoCUjizA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.43.1469877947.6033.python-list@python.org> <c6df24e3-3f4f-43be-be18-bc9eaa91606b@googlegroups.com> <579cbded$0$1605$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <758a1961-00bc-4b1c-834b-a7deca94d029@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmpfBZX7JjyxaFkmWLnd9m0dF-qN_wndzra_5Ozyx0JY9g@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.56.1469896666.6033.python-list@python.org> <e053i3F9kf6U1@mid.individual.net> <CAPTjJmo1fkFQdMUWo6yEc9MaLZMvZqpso+0QXw24-xEEm7erdg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de r2X7BDZA0roq5HIaHgWVvgF+cq6PdiLE8i6kmvnlN2ZA==
Return-Path <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; '"as': 0.07; 'compile- time': 0.07; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'api': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python- list': 0.09; 'merged': 0.09; 'none"': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'subject:not': 0.11; 'ignore': 0.14; 'result.': 0.15; '"always': 0.16; '2016': 0.16; 'distinction': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'gregory': 0.16; 'personally,': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'stark': 0.16; 'subject:allow': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; '31,': 0.22; 'pascal': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'decide': 0.23; '(this': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'all.': 0.24; '(which': 0.26; 'chris': 0.26; 'error': 0.27; 'least': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'errors.': 0.27; 'function': 0.28; 'values': 0.28; 'callable': 0.29; 'does,': 0.29; 'objects': 0.29; 'classes': 0.30; 'code': 0.30; 'certain': 0.31; "can't": 0.32; 'useful': 0.33; 'languages': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'seem': 0.37; 'difference': 0.38; 'means': 0.39; "didn't": 0.39; 'well.': 0.40; 'called': 0.40; 'care': 0.60; 'great': 0.63; 'between': 0.65; 'fundamental': 0.66; 'decided': 0.66; 'jul': 0.72; '11:45': 0.84; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:cc; bh=sADe1NtVQ2NhSA5CuE29nFL+J8pT/XJCmUd4d0o2zGY=; b=TfY53zitFe4wdoT4hjhVeE0gfu0izZAN5A3BApvBCY1WU3afF8Wu0kmDW4vIBaZJ8V APhbEBzThir2tEg1jL+oXHWAw1dYy3HPvzADug6j6bqF6+fFJJUjPoWrresWYwWXuuzh RXB0t8JmGRIRhH3GutT60kyv/YeGiQslGyaufxhJl1UUOwXvg5u2C8UZ/d3VGCJKJ22k Dk0/B6IZ+nUej2qaBeaFc7bfZ7pcuvRYUUkG8zZI4NtpeW59ZDSghA+Vjg/9dV2BNGFx DZR0Ns8wWSo9DLMPwJHS/zaaUVfen3cqF5Xeixcxl0L9ox0qbilA2yYIxzxxmZZ50+cD 9wYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:cc; bh=sADe1NtVQ2NhSA5CuE29nFL+J8pT/XJCmUd4d0o2zGY=; b=m8I1NObtkjKqwFZP6HKUwlCfZ8GMjANpRJp9BG8NNKn/At+Upp/jW8aCucircHEefI etF+aQvDfR1uFer+k54YNaLKVp4GwxSXQbNQw94FMIb7ABGmmSaaMJhkcJwz0nptcVkc PQvWorkhBtC24nEIMTn9KTu5GVAfg+9OUwuWUVZl8psWhSLgdD6/1f/0sX8aeJSG1lNX 7p+U7mmJYB+pJd7HRN24SIorTYE3/crVMJSWjdcgWbmd+GsstN1+R5OGxpK2BNdkmLt1 Kxgk+JzyM4WpFVTSyewaQQLtI1XkwBf66ugwKM8/6u8Z5e2EUiFbi1R3sO4nOHzkcPrk Ij/g==
X-Gm-Message-State AEkoousbZ+pCCr6AB5CPqlnDZ2kj4Bp2PoDnnJu/bYNAyBzVc7NxMvEu4bRqp2koSL3xJaDQFI5EekQwsjczcQ==
X-Received by 10.194.175.38 with SMTP id bx6mr49129643wjc.47.1469931425135; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 19:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <e053i3F9kf6U1@mid.individual.net>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <CAPTjJmo1fkFQdMUWo6yEc9MaLZMvZqpso+0QXw24-xEEm7erdg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <b80ae0ca-d8b2-4430-96a1-7a6768b177ef@googlegroups.com> <87vazwppxx.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <CAPTjJmotJBomzHRR4bY04mVFwgMWAUp_7HDhJyd2v+jHYmnGjQ@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.74.1469273692.22221.python-list@python.org> <nmvt9g$nj6$1@dont-email.me> <CAPTjJmqjaLOZLiBHG2ADrsHmOwdAsEfAHQ1vDwDpMTM+GU=zzg@mail.gmail.com> <579B1ABB.1070500@rece.vub.ac.be> <nngbk6$vce$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.36.1469821397.6033.python-list@python.org> <nngdns$um1$1@dont-email.me> <579c2095$0$22142$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <nnhuni$op$1@dont-email.me> <CAPTjJmq7caLKiimgEt_HbhSNcyv+c6_+8sF_odcGx6yoCUjizA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.43.1469877947.6033.python-list@python.org> <c6df24e3-3f4f-43be-be18-bc9eaa91606b@googlegroups.com> <579cbded$0$1605$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <758a1961-00bc-4b1c-834b-a7deca94d029@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmpfBZX7JjyxaFkmWLnd9m0dF-qN_wndzra_5Ozyx0JY9g@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.56.1469896666.6033.python-list@python.org> <e053i3F9kf6U1@mid.individual.net>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:112107

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Gregory Ewing
<greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> So do I need to be able to "call a function as if it
>> were a procedure", or is there a stark difference between the two
>> types of callable?
>
>
> Well, Pascal makes a stark distinction between them -- it's
> a compile-time error to call a procedure as though it were
> a function or vice versa in Pascal -- and it didn't seem to
> cause any great problems.
>
> So it's at least possible to write useful code under such
> circumstances, and it might even help to catch certain
> classes of errors. But the ability to ignore return values
> can be useful as well. Most languages since have decided
> not to make the distinction, and don't seem to have
> suffered noticeably as a result.

Yeah. The distinction means you have a fundamental API difference
between the procedures (which don't return anything) and the functions
(whose return values you mightn't care about). It means you can't
upgrade something from "always returns None" to "returns the number of
objects frobbed" without breaking compat. Conversely, if you decide
that any function can be called "as a procedure" (this is what REXX
does, for instance), then you've just merged the two types of callable
and distinguished them only in usage.

Personally, I don't see any value to the distinction at all.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why not allow empty code blocks? Kent Tong <kent.tong.mo@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 08:33 -0700
  Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2016-07-22 16:44 +0000
  Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-23 11:49 +1000
    Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Kent Tong <kent.tong.mo@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 19:06 -0700
    Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-23 14:13 +0300
      Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 21:34 +1000
        Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-23 14:49 +0300
        Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-23 15:00 +0100
          Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 00:19 +1000
          Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-29 10:58 +0200
          Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-29 07:14 -0400
            Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-29 14:15 +0100
              Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 07:41 -0600
              Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-29 23:43 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-29 15:55 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-30 00:38 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-29 20:32 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-30 13:49 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-08-02 09:31 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-29 12:28 -0400
              Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-29 12:20 -0400
          Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-29 15:46 +0200
          Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-07-29 15:43 -0400
            Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-29 21:19 +0100
              Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-30 01:01 +0300
              Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-30 13:35 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 11:15 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 21:25 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 04:39 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 21:49 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 05:11 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 22:22 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 05:31 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 22:44 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 01:07 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 13:39 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 22:47 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 22:47 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 13:27 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 22:34 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 00:58 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 00:47 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 09:15 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 09:29 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 03:53 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 12:16 -0600
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-31 13:37 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 19:34 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 13:14 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 20:34 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:12 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 23:42 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-30 22:10 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-31 19:39 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-31 10:51 +0300
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 01:18 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 06:51 -0600
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 09:23 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 01:14 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-01 03:06 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 10:32 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 02:37 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 09:58 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 03:15 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 10:48 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-31 13:45 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 12:17 +1000
                Procedures and functions [was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?] Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 13:32 +1000
                Re: Procedures and functions [was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?] "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-31 00:01 -0400
                Re: Procedures and functions [was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?] Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 16:40 +1000
                Re: Procedures and functions [was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?] Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 23:47 -0700
                Re: Procedures and functions [was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 16:55 +1000
                Re: Procedures and functions [was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:05 +1000
                Re: Procedures and functions [was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?] Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-31 00:26 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-30 23:51 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:21 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 21:22 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-08-02 12:30 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 05:29 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-08-03 10:26 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 04:48 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-08-03 15:09 +0300
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 05:23 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 05:27 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-08-03 15:37 +0300
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 05:43 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-08-03 15:34 +0300
                {non sequitur/bad humor} was: Why not allow empty code blocks? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-03 18:01 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 02:43 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-30 23:06 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 23:36 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 14:58 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 01:48 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 02:34 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 19:46 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 12:10 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-30 23:41 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-31 11:18 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-01 01:31 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-31 12:39 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bart4858@gmail.com - 2016-07-31 17:11 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 10:21 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 17:55 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 11:10 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 19:09 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 12:14 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bart4858@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 00:55 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-31 22:08 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-07-31 21:29 -0400
                Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-07-31 14:58 -0400
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-02 12:05 +0100
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 00:58 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-02 18:12 +0100
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Steven D'Aprano <steve+python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-03 03:57 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-02 20:14 +0100
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-03 15:43 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-03 11:16 +0100
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 23:18 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Steven D'Aprano <steve+python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-04 13:23 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-04 10:13 +0100
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 19:39 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-04 19:38 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-08-04 14:37 -0400
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 04:54 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 05:18 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2016-08-02 21:55 +0200
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 06:50 +1000
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-08-02 17:27 -0400
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-02 14:54 -0700
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-02 23:38 +0100
                Re: Debugging (was Re: Why not allow empty code blocks?) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 05:03 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-31 15:12 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:07 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 15:16 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 02:08 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-31 02:10 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-31 15:10 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-30 10:39 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 16:14 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-30 13:11 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-30 19:15 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2016-08-01 00:25 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-31 11:53 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2016-08-03 23:38 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-31 12:04 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 09:27 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2016-08-02 01:30 +1000
                Using valid emails "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-08-01 12:05 -0400
                Re: Using valid emails Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 02:22 +1000
                Re: Using valid emails Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-08-01 22:16 +0300
                Re: Using valid emails "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-08-01 12:40 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-08-01 22:14 +0300
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-31 19:41 +0300
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-01 03:22 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "Jan Erik Moström" <lists@mostrom.pp.se> - 2016-07-31 20:58 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:01 -0600
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bart4858@gmail.com - 2016-07-31 16:43 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 09:49 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bart4858@gmail.com - 2016-07-31 17:21 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 10:33 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bart4858@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 01:05 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-08-01 09:50 +0000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bart4858@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 06:26 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-01 20:12 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bart4858@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 06:19 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? bartc <bart4858@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 13:22 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 06:28 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-02 17:56 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve+python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-03 03:54 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 05:10 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-02 20:19 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 19:38 +0000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? lists@juliensalort.org (Julien Salort) - 2016-08-02 21:45 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve+python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-03 03:50 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-02 12:22 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 03:02 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-08-03 18:58 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 05:16 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 22:36 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-03 14:04 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 23:25 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 14:06 +0000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-08-03 20:40 +0000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-03 14:23 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 23:31 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-03 19:52 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 06:12 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-03 21:53 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 07:39 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-03 23:21 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 08:31 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-04 00:51 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-03 16:25 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-08-04 00:48 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-08-01 09:40 +0000
                Using valid emails "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-08-01 12:32 -0400
                Re: Using valid emails Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 12:38 -0600
                Re: Using valid emails "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-08-01 15:27 -0400
        Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2016-07-28 20:01 +0000
          Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 06:11 +1000
      Detecting the trivial can be non-trivial (was Why not allow empty code blocks?) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 05:28 -0700
        Re: Detecting the trivial can be non-trivial (was Why not allow empty code blocks?) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-24 11:15 +0100
          Re: Detecting the trivial can be non-trivial (was Why not allow empty code blocks?) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 07:49 -0700
      Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-23 08:29 -0400
        Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-23 16:13 +0300
          Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@Vex.Net> - 2016-07-23 09:54 -0400
            Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-23 15:06 +0100
              Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-24 01:55 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 11:35 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 11:45 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 21:27 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 14:09 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 23:24 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 15:05 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-25 00:32 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-25 12:40 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-25 02:14 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-07-25 11:45 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 09:54 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 03:02 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 10:11 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 03:26 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 19:43 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 20:48 -0600
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 13:12 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 20:20 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 13:28 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 20:46 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-25 17:20 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-25 14:27 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? neceros@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 11:27 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-24 22:17 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 08:28 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 22:48 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 23:38 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marco Sulla <mail.python.org@marco.sulla.e4ward.com> - 2016-07-24 15:11 +0200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 15:44 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 00:51 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 19:14 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Jonathan Hayward <jonathan.hayward@pobox.com> - 2016-07-24 13:34 -0500
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-07-24 18:52 +0000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 05:00 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 21:03 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 07:08 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-24 23:13 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-25 13:04 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-25 10:44 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-26 19:21 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-26 10:56 +0300
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-26 20:35 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-26 11:11 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-25 12:37 +1000
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-25 11:39 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-26 19:23 +1200
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-25 10:36 -0400
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-25 18:33 +0100
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 17:56 -0700
                Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-26 16:31 +0200

csiph-web