Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #65033

Re: Another surprise from the datetime module

Show all headers | View raw

On 2014-01-30, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote:
> I was astounded just now to discover that datetime.timedelta
> doesn't have a replace() method (at least not in Python 2.7).
> Is there some fundamental reason why it shouldn't, or is this
> just an oversight?
>
> My immediate use case was wanting to print a timedelta without
> the fractions of seconds.  The most straight-forward is:
>
> print td.replace(microseconds=0)

That would be nice.

In the meantime, this works for your use case:

td -= td % timedelta(seconds=1)

-- 
Neil Cerutti

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Another surprise from the datetime module roy@panix.com (Roy Smith) - 2014-01-30 12:32 -0500
  Re: Another surprise from the datetime module Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-01-30 18:03 +0000
  Re: Another surprise from the datetime module Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2014-01-30 18:36 +0000

csiph-web