Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #3646
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.015 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'wed,': 0.04; 'sure.': 0.05; 'subject:()': 0.09; 'pm,': 0.11; 'essentially': 0.12; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'rebert': 0.16; 'subject:List': 0.20; 'work,': 0.20; 'variable': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; "aren't": 0.22; 'appears': 0.24; "what's": 0.24; "i'm": 0.26; 'chris': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; "doesn't": 0.28; 'least': 0.30; 'named': 0.30; 'list': 0.30; 'that...': 0.31; 'however,': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; 'things': 0.33; 'on,': 0.33; 'quite': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'some': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; '20,': 0.38; 'apr': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'explain': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'would': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'might': 0.40; '2011': 0.62; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.84; 'received:mail- iy0-f174.google.com': 0.84 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qIa3a6kbiJOp9gRdb6nBJuv9jN2Zgbpx8kT+nM4Za8U=; b=YWIV+shqNi3EaPf5MZ3tL8dJtSEmNreqOFVJjDryXlMVnALIwZTBs2YW5w/p3wTRPE sAFMZQLUyWzj8gy2UUbsrkqw0h/ByBc1uI/oo+WNNoTQGTG9ducIq8UAdIab2t6j/0ay 6NQ5HbyuEQtYQbnH4tgU2DvzUXH9jD842zRp8= |
| DomainKey-Signature | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=sxxoitcTF95V7AUyRpyohmLhLSMCFNnzLRqD6JpOb3KBDGm0zPxISrOYWoa9969pAT iZINjNmcZzTlZlS4taEPyRXWYXTiG3fFcFJwVsVVxZ3H5sf25evx8oTrCEd6HSMMe1LL XPGZwj/DGzkpdRfK8z2qQZkuv0yO19Z38N54Q= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <BANLkTimmfwZ5dB+Vt8S2-rYAwS4axvn8og@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <BANLkTin4KMcoWzfH64Eu=+sD9=M3TaAu2A@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinVhX1jDd5brOh1D1m4zU5R8pEoSQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimvUPXRKOvGNqDzNCJp0UuWT1AkVg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimmfwZ5dB+Vt8S2-rYAwS4axvn8og@mail.gmail.com> |
| Date | Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:59:42 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: List comprehension vs filter() |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.611.1303271986.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 10 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 82.94.164.166 |
| X-Trace | 1303271986 news.xs4all.nl 32470 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:53934 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:3646 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> wrote: > Built-ins aren't quite the same as globals, but essentially yes: Sure. That might explain some of the weirdness, but it doesn't explain why things were still weird with the variable named posttype. However, since the list comp appears to work, I'm going with that... would love to know what's going on, but at least things aren't utterly b0rked like they were two hours ago! Chris Angelico
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: List comprehension vs filter() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-20 13:59 +1000
Re: List comprehension vs filter() Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2011-04-20 00:16 -0700
Re: List comprehension vs filter() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-20 18:36 +1000
Re: List comprehension vs filter() Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-04-20 10:12 -0400
csiph-web