Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #95241
| References | <CAK_Erkid-bWZpUhmLsBmRvDPW2iyQG-RHLRq4LrgJozoC6tMvQ@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 20:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: looking for standard/builtin dict-like data object |
| From | Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.61.1439264168.3627.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Vladimir Ignatov <kmisoft@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > In my code I often use my own home-brewed object for passing bunch of > data between functions. Something like: > > class Data(object): > def __init__ (self, **kwargs): > self.__dict__ = kwargs > > .... > > return Data(attr1=..., attr2=..., attr3=...) > > Logically it works like plain dictionary but with nice result.attrX > syntax on client side (instead of resut['attrX']). Overall I am > pretty happy with this approach except that I need to drag Data class > around my projects and import its module in every code producing data. > > I am curious if anybody knows similar "dummy" class located in > standard libraries? I'd be glad to use it instead. This is commonly known as a "Bunch" class, after the Python Cookbook recipe. I don't believe there's any public version of it in the std lib, but there is a PyPI package for it: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/bunch However, if the set of attribute names is fixed and an immutable datatype is acceptable, you could use the std lib's "namedtuple" type: https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.html#collections.namedtuple Cheers, Chris -- http://chrisrebert.com
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: looking for standard/builtin dict-like data object Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2015-08-10 20:36 -0700
csiph-web