Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #55301

Re: Lowest Value in List

Show all headers | View raw

Op 02-10-13 12:04, subhabangalore@gmail.com schreef:
> Dear Group,
> 
> I am trying to work out a solution to the following problem in Python. 
> 
> The Problem:
> Suppose I have three lists.
> Each list is having 10 elements in ascending order.
> I have to construct one list having 10 elements which are of the lowest value among these 30 elements present in the three given lists.
> 
> The Solution:
> 
> I tried to address the issue in the following ways:
> 
> a) I took three lists, like,
> list1=[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
> list2=[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
> list3=[-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4]
> 
> I tried to make sum and convert them as set to drop the repeating elements:
> set_sum=set(list1+list2+list3)
> set([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, -1, -5, -4, -3, -2])
> 
> In the next step I tried to convert it back to list as,
> list_set=list(set_sum)
> gave the value as,
> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, -1, -5, -4, -3, -2]
> 
> Now, I imported heapq as, 
> import heapq
> 
> and took the result as,
> result=heapq.nsmallest(10,list_set)
> it gave as,
> [-5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
> 
> b) I am thinking to work out another approach.
> I am taking the lists again as,
> 
> list1=[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
> list2=[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
> list3=[-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4]
> 
> as they are in ascending order, I am trying to take first four/five elements of each list,like,
> 
> list1_4=list1[:4]
>>>> list2_4=list2[:4]
>>>> list3_4=list3[:4]
> 
> Now, I am trying to add them as,
> 
> list11=list1_4+list2_4+list3_4
> 
> thus, giving us the result
> 
> [1, 2, 3, 4, 0, 1, 2, 3, -5, -4, -3, -2]
> 
> Now, we are trying to sort the list of the set of the sum as,
> 
> sort_sum=sorted(list(set(list11)))
> 
> giving us the required result as,
> 
> [-5, -4, -3, -2, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
> 
> If by taking the value of each list portion as 4 gives as less number of
> elements in final value, as we are making set to avoid repeating numbers,
> we increase element count by one or two and if final result becomes more
> than 10 we take first ten.
> 
> Are these approaches fine. Or should we think some other way.
> 
> If any learned member of the group can kindly let me know how to solve I would be helpful enough.

You may consider a merge phase from the merge sort. Something like the
following: (Pseudo code; not tested)

iters = [iter(list1), iter(list2), iter(list3)]
heads = [(itr.next() for itr in Iters]

index, value = find_smallest_from(heads) # This function finds the
smalles value and returns it with its index

last = value
result = [value]
heads[index] = iters[index].next()
while len(results) < 10:
    index, value = find_smallest_from(heads)
    if value == last:
        continue
    last = value
    result.append(value)
    heads[index] = iters[index].next()

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Lowest Value in List subhabangalore@gmail.com - 2013-10-02 03:04 -0700
  Re: Lowest Value in List Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-02 10:10 +0000
  Re: Lowest Value in List Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-10-02 12:42 +0200
  Re: Lowest Value in List dvghana@gmail.com - 2013-10-02 05:56 -0700
  Re: Lowest Value in List Ravi Sahni <ganeshsahni07@gmail.com> - 2013-10-02 19:35 +0530
  Re: Lowest Value in List Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-10-03 13:12 +0200

csiph-web