Re: main and dependent objects

References	<CAF_E5Jbcc=Vmvy20bE271XOe3xHxjxiZ-XF_snyOXJ4E4JW_Vw@mail.gmail.com> <57804014.446922.1347542664064.JavaMail.root@sequans.com>
Date	2012-09-13 15:59 +0100
Subject	Re: main and dependent objects
From	andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.608.1347548377.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

2012/9/13 Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com>:
>
> Nothing shocking right here imo. It looks like a classic parent-child implementation.
> However it seems the relation between Obj and Dependent are 1-to-1. Since Dependent need to access all Obj attributes, are you sure that Dependent and Obj are not actually the same class ?
>
>
> JM

Yes well the main class is already big enough, and the relation is 1-1
but the dependent class can be also considered separate to split
things more nicely..

So I think it will stay like this for now and see how it goes.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: main and dependent objects andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-09-13 15:59 +0100

csiph-web