Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #3633
| Date | 2011-04-20 13:10 +1000 |
|---|---|
| Subject | List comprehension vs filter() |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.603.1303269025.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Context: Embedded Python interpreter, version 2.6.6
I have a list of dictionaries, where each dictionary has a "type"
element which is a string. I want to reduce the list to just the
dictionaries which have the same "type" as the first one.
lst=[{"type":"calc",...},{"type":"fixed",...},{"type":"calc",...},...]
I'm seeing a weird difference between two otherwise-equivalent-looking
ways of doing the job.
type=lst[0]["type"].lower()
lst=filter(lambda x: x["type"].lower()==type,lst) # Restrict to that one type
lst=[i for i in lst if i["type"].lower()==type] # Restrict to that one type
If I use the filter() method, the resulting list is completely empty.
If I use the list comprehension, it works perfectly. Oddly, either
version works in the stand-alone interpreter.
I have no idea where to start looking for the problem. Hints, please!
Chris Angelico
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
List comprehension vs filter() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-20 13:10 +1000
Re: List comprehension vs filter() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-20 10:16 +0000
Re: List comprehension vs filter() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-20 21:25 +1000
Re: List comprehension vs filter() Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-04-20 12:41 +0200
Re: List comprehension vs filter() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-04-20 08:44 -0600
Re: List comprehension vs filter() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-21 04:03 +1000
Re: List comprehension vs filter() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-04-20 12:35 -0600
csiph-web