Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #95433
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Python 3 sort() problem |
| Date | 2015-08-17 15:18 +0100 |
| References | <006601d0d8e1$c17c1480$44743d80$@inbox.ru> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.60.1439821153.4764.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 17/08/2015 12:42, Владислав wrote: > # first: works fine > > x = [1, 2, 4, 2, 1, 3] > x = list(set(x)) > x.sort() > print(x) /# output: 1, 2, 3, 4 > > /# second: why x became None ?? > > x = [1, 2, 4, 2, 1, 3] > x = list(set(x)).sort() > print(x) /# output: None/ > > I know that sort() returns None, but I guess that it would be returned x > that was sorted. Why so?/ A set is created from x. This is converted to a list. You call sort() and assign the return value from that, None, to x. You will see exactly the same thing above if you do:- x = x.sort() -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Python 3 sort() problem Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 15:18 +0100
csiph-web