Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #103679

Re: Computational Chemistry Analysis

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Jason Swails <jason.swails@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Computational Chemistry Analysis
Date Sun, 28 Feb 2016 22:58:44 -0500
Lines 61
Message-ID <mailman.6.1456718328.2321.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <CO1PR01MB094174742E1C62A0016BA1D82A60@CO1PR01MB094.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de 1WnJb0h2b5CUMSc2q3AVvQBB+xn1iFAPNKtZ3rwW0KLQ==
Return-Path <jason.swails@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.182
X-Spam-Level *
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.64; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'essentially': 0.04; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'underlying': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'wed,': 0.15; '2016': 0.16; '24,': 0.16; 'binding.': 0.16; 'defacto': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'student': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'to:2**1': 0.21; '(the': 0.22; 'programming': 0.22; 'feb': 0.23; 'wrote': 0.23; 'interfaces': 0.23; 'originally': 0.23; 'written': 0.24; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'script': 0.25; 'helpful': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'consult': 0.27; 'specifically': 0.28; 'this.': 0.28; 'there.': 0.30; 'code': 0.30; '(i.e.,': 0.30; 'branch': 0.30; 'lab': 0.30; 'run': 0.33; 'options': 0.33; 'builds': 0.33; 'similar': 0.33; 'lists': 0.34; 'list': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'jason': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; '(and': 0.36; '(i.e.': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'skip:& 10': 0.37; 'received:209.85.213': 0.37; 'suggestion': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.38; 'wrong': 0.38; 'mailing': 0.38; 'google': 0.39; 'test': 0.39; 'whatever': 0.39; 'questions': 0.40; 'software': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'hope': 0.61; 'programs': 0.62; 'research': 0.62; 'modeling': 0.63; 'studies': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'places': 0.64; 'experience.': 0.66; 'binding': 0.66; 'potentially': 0.67; 'worth': 0.67; 'dear': 0.67; 'news': 0.68; 'wish': 0.71; 'drug': 0.72; 'programs,': 0.72; 'analysis': 0.72; 'hoping': 0.77; 'url:10': 0.79; 'amber': 0.84; 'calculations': 0.84; 'chemistry,': 0.84; 'experiment': 0.84; 'start.': 0.84; 'suites,': 0.84; 'using.': 0.84; 'analyses': 0.91; 'dynamics': 0.91; 'probe': 0.91; 'choice.': 0.93; 'trained': 0.95
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=pnkhltvwiK2I3Qi2VrJgyJoYS/JMwzqdpXId6v20/Gg=; b=04seV7MrNgK0LhfJ0KmWFfkHuiiCkySnAbD1tbv/NCX0fIBeZtYqtGZXbIA1GsydWg fzahoo1qZQ18LSK9+Y97dAIAmN5Q0QSfCw0C9nG7x4woGBcDH7/6HaFEm/vjp4jMUGAq MZeFveK1EwuSPjPODHpVF73IVsayxr3hhbqQpUuUMxnOgFMT4HSoMJmfIBtbiWDC/evs 0Rm07bTqGrr7f1eDzejrMFFMuF7xaxGWMZijhu1l07u7FxU0MezMmWOshEuhAqNOWU61 7vestHbhKDtn/hh9th50ODHmBCWuBoHy9cgEtQcHnZaBJ7fWJbSG+Q+Ace8rLJnNbAsP PU0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=pnkhltvwiK2I3Qi2VrJgyJoYS/JMwzqdpXId6v20/Gg=; b=NscViQuqGwUcZHTu0rJGgEUmRv244nKIPVnsoqs5E29k4iKllQxOZXorqUxyVIJP6U fxLVWpGYRxZ/GZaehKuto2kdsaYqguzViQHKCJtQhArWcCCnej8yOs3fQTcHp+mBjcl3 vkUxe7Tr9y9xY+5GfkU2qdLK+R0jeSDYAf0t9knwT/5e5wClo046Lseekjp7hW/UC270 RKBt3sgbaRtQLgipLA2mLqCMcR/l5hrKYk35f3A2aYgj6x+sxH9MZ2eGyPs6WxnoH/7n UWScM7vAgUj0EB0o7l5mSLOKUPtmfx/27NPz4AcG6OmcWdgmCyuQtKy2myr3sS1CWgoY F41A==
X-Gm-Message-State AD7BkJLbjGHMf8ePvSfoCGb4sxasYNm1RrJeCZq8jiJe/M1gpmTB5KTlnMgdZLpMb6FAdVR0GZoToI9PGmuqlw==
X-Received by 10.31.1.6 with SMTP id 6mr8397146vkb.139.1456718324373; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:58:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <CO1PR01MB094174742E1C62A0016BA1D82A60@CO1PR01MB094.prod.exchangelabs.com>
X-Content-Filtered-By Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.21
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:103679

Show key headers only | View raw


On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Feagans, Mandy <af154@evansville.edu>
wrote:

> Dear Python,
>
>
> Hi! I am a student interested in conducting computational analysis of
> protein-ligand binding for drug development analysis. Recently, I read of
> an individual using a python program for their studies of protein-ligand
> binding. As I have been reading about Python programs, however, all I have
> been able to find are programs that use the python script (i.e. Autodock).
> I was hoping to see if there were any programs specifically run through the
> python programming that ran similar analysis to Autodock?
>

​Being trained as a computational chemist myself (and having learned Python
by writing a program for carrying out protein-ligand free energy
calculations: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ct300418h), I had to
answer...

There are a number of programs out there that are aimed at computational
modeling of biomolecules, and many of them are written in Python or have
Python interfaces (pymol, chimera, MMPBSA.py, OpenMM to name a very small
few).  However, this is definitely not the right forum to ask such
questions as a very small number of people who frequent this list are
computational chemists (I check it only occasionally).

Looking for a program to do something because it's written in Python is the
wrong way to go about this.  You need to design your experiment (i.e., what
you want to test and what you hope to learn), then try to design a set of
calculations and analyses that will allow you to probe your underlying
hypothesis.  Then you should pick the software to perform these analyses
based on the best choice.  That choice is very frequently whatever others
in your lab are using.  A research group builds up experience (based
originally on the experience of the PI, typically) in a set of programs
they use for their computational experiments, and deviating from that set
of programs essentially discards potentially decades worth of experience.
So my suggestion -- ask other group members or the professor what softwares
they use, and consult Google if you wish to branch out a little.

You can also find more applicable mailing lists to ask questions about
computational chemistry, like the CCL or molecular dynamics news (the CCL
being the defacto "Computational Chemistry List").  That should help give
perhaps more helpful places to start.

FWIW, I did all my work with the AMBER and OpenMM software suites, (and
wrote a substantial amount of code for both projects).  But those are far
from the only options out there.

HTH,
Jason

-- 
Jason M. Swails
BioMaPS,
Rutgers University
Postdoctoral Researcher

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Computational Chemistry Analysis Jason Swails <jason.swails@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 22:58 -0500

csiph-web