Re: generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists

From	Dave Angel <davea@davea.name>
Subject	Re: generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists
Date	2014-01-23 20:08 -0500
Organization	news.gmane.org
References	<CALyJZZVU+j64Jn7fqqzLmwW+KcM=43UMKjo=HW7umnq8MSP2Uw@mail.gmail.com> <lbrf82$fb3$1@ger.gmane.org> <CALyJZZVtprtuZ1GCKKDppfwHybGaSyqZHpP_+3fUKB84TruJUg@mail.gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.5921.1390525561.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

 Vincent Davis <vincent@vincentdavis.net> Wrote in message:
> 

I didn't really study the code,  and the fact that there's a
 nested function could mess it up.  But if it were a
 straightforward function with exactly one append, , then
 replacing the append with a yield would produce the string one
 character at a time.


-- 
DaveA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-01-23 20:08 -0500

csiph-web