Re: No overflow in variables?

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.003
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.99; 'S': 0.00; '(even': 0.05; 'cpython': 0.05; 'scaling': 0.07; 'integers': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'jan': 0.12; '23,': 0.16; 'arbitrarily': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'infinity': 0.16; 'sure.': 0.16; 'thereabouts.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'library': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; 'thu,': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'format,': 0.24; 'integer': 0.24; 'helpful': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'gives': 0.31; '(including': 0.33; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'thanks': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'wrong': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'christian': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'cost.': 0.60; 'numbers': 0.61; 'worth': 0.66; 'believe': 0.68; 'concept.': 0.84; 'difference.': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=ZPuGJN1wnZA4mr477iKDmzQm55ZRmLDMrK9LoFBMJ68=; b=dIHWxlHhVJaplqecS+/BSlCN4HORhsdfrgoVBe7H3w4XffqpmnHw0d0PJQZLiEYIAY BUeZP4bO2riOPattDoUTvYVTCet3ar7Zsy/AWRvY8yrwYZ9OPpWWSI50POcK3NMtkbkk OOftqSRUj/uddWYyhhpZbKLOaD5+heoOJjziIl3/x3PGSWFr305C56enXN5UQ9lm3fML NoS/dX6FxmA8+6kar1eX3DuZmLCavD2g7W3B14g09ihW73N+NPB+hBR5eGw1LxVr5WHm TDRQqBfpt4kexzd8T0huttxve4iPZTi9YaQzdjJM/S4JCuOJTQjpKK5ZMx8N+Gvm9tQc WpnA==
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Received	by 10.66.102.39 with SMTP id fl7mr7032929pab.43.1390469778657; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 01:36:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To	<lbqmhd$h5r$1@ger.gmane.org>
References	<dd6a72bf-b1c4-4868-9cfe-76dfac8b8787@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmqkSc+9O5XUWO6Zvm82eZ+853qgGugzA-Vngui4VPAQjw@mail.gmail.com> <lbqmhd$h5r$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date	Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:36:18 +1100
Subject	Re: No overflow in variables?
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Cc	"python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.5879.1390469782.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	18
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1390469782 news.xs4all.nl 2967 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46880
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:64587

Show key headers only | View raw

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> wrote:
> On 22.01.2014 19:26, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Internally, I believe CPython uses the GNU Multiprecision Library
>> (GMP), which gives an efficient representation and operation format,
>> scaling to infinity or thereabouts. You can go to any size of integer
>> you like without there being any difference. There's a cost to that
>> (even small integers are a bit slower to work with), but it's SO
>> helpful to be able to work with arbitrarily large numbers that it's
>> worth that cost.
>
> Small correction: Python isn't using GMP. Python uses its own
> implementation.

Okay, wasn't sure. I've seen others that use GMP (including Pike,
which can also use arbitrary-precision floats if you wish). Wrong in
the specifics, right in the concept. Thanks for the correction.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

No overflow in variables? Philip Red <filippo.biolcati@googlemail.com> - 2014-01-22 10:09 -0800
  Re: No overflow in variables? Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> - 2014-01-22 11:18 -0700
  Re:No overflow in variables? Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-01-22 13:26 -0500
  Re: No overflow in variables? Philip Red <filippo.biolcati@googlemail.com> - 2014-01-22 10:32 -0800
  Re: No overflow in variables? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-23 05:26 +1100
    Re: No overflow in variables? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-01-22 15:55 -0500
    Re: No overflow in variables? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-01-23 11:22 +1300
  Re: No overflow in variables? Philip Red <filippo.biolcati@googlemail.com> - 2014-01-22 10:48 -0800
  Re: No overflow in variables? random832@fastmail.us - 2014-01-22 18:13 -0500
  Re: No overflow in variables? Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> - 2014-01-23 10:14 +0100
  Re: No overflow in variables? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-23 20:36 +1100

csiph-web