Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #12447

Re: Returning a value from exec or a better solution

Show all headers | View raw

Rob Williscroft wrote:
> Ethan Furman wrote in news:4E5D29C8.8010206@stoneleaf.us in 
> gmane.comp.python.general:
> 
>> Jack Trades wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Rob Williscroft wrote:
>>>> If an impementation (as you say up thread) can populate globals
>>>> or locals with whatever they want, then how do you know that last
>>>> item added was the function definition the user supplied ?
>> Because the implementation will add things before the exec is processed. 
> 
> How do you know this ?, it isn't what the docs say.
> 
> http://docs.python.org/reference/simple_stmts.html#the-exec-statement

The docs don't say when, true -- so I don't know for sure that all 
additions happen before the exec since I haven't delved into the source 
code...

Okay, just perused builtin_exec in bltinmodule.c, and I can say that 
cPython (somewhere in 3.2-3.3 land) only adds __builtins__ if not 
already there, and that it does it first.

Which makes sense -- after all, what's the point of adding stuff to 
globals() *after* the code has been run?

~Ethan~

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Returning a value from exec or a better solution Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-08-30 13:59 -0700

csiph-web