Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #12443
| From | Rob Williscroft <rtw@rtw.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Returning a value from exec or a better solution |
| Date | 2011-08-30 19:28 +0000 |
| References | <CAG5udOgxSmQrVOm+fPO_wsJsDLeR6jie0AgJFvauODd+2eA21g@mail.gmail.com> <4E5D29C8.8010206@stoneleaf.us> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.578.1314732546.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Ethan Furman wrote in news:4E5D29C8.8010206@stoneleaf.us in gmane.comp.python.general: > Jack Trades wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Rob Williscroft wrote: >>> If an impementation (as you say up thread) can populate globals >>> or locals with whatever they want, then how do you know that last >>> item added was the function definition the user supplied ? > > Because the implementation will add things before the exec is processed. How do you know this ?, it isn't what the docs say. http://docs.python.org/reference/simple_stmts.html#the-exec-statement Rob.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Returning a value from exec or a better solution Rob Williscroft <rtw@rtw.me.uk> - 2011-08-30 19:28 +0000
csiph-web