Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #108486

Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter...

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter...
Date Tue, 10 May 2016 15:34:06 -0400
Lines 27
Message-ID <mailman.574.1462908862.32212.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <572BF2BF.6000000@icloud.com> <1462498631.232041.599637409.25D91C08@webmail.messagingengine.com> <572E3F53.5010703@icloud.com> <ngm5em$jnn$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.489.1462671648.32212.python-list@python.org> <e309810a-d9a7-42b9-8e9f-14b8c03ab482@googlegroups.com> <ngtd3h$vs1$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de /8zhnozoUwwLsoOvKnye+wx+r018la14MNbwRIv6hZEA==
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.004
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'guido': 0.05; 'ignored': 0.05; 'subject:skip:c 10': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'bug': 0.10; 'jan': 0.11; "'bad": 0.16; '(1.6)': 0.16; 'anymore': 0.16; 'manner,': 0.16; 'objection': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'rejected.': 0.16; 'sad': 0.16; 'such,': 0.16; 'valid.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'issue.': 0.20; 'developers.': 0.22; 'trying': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'subject:list': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'least': 0.27; 'towards': 0.28; 'ago': 0.29; "we're": 0.30; 'core': 0.32; 'reported': 0.32; 'impression': 0.33; 'know.': 0.34; 'next': 0.35; 'false': 0.35; 'comment': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'instead': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'agree': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'hiring': 0.37; 'release': 0.37; 'wanted': 0.37; "won't": 0.38; 'feedback': 0.38; 'someone': 0.38; 'thank': 0.38; 'rather': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'group,': 0.60; 'your': 0.60; 'received:96': 0.63; 'different': 0.63; 'managers': 0.63; 'you.': 0.64; 'evaluate': 0.72; 'score': 0.76; 'applicants': 0.83; 'mistaken': 0.84; 'subject:over': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.91; 'enhancement': 0.96
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host pool-96-227-207-81.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
In-Reply-To <e309810a-d9a7-42b9-8e9f-14b8c03ab482@googlegroups.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <ngtd3h$vs1$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Mailman-Original-References <572BF2BF.6000000@icloud.com> <1462498631.232041.599637409.25D91C08@webmail.messagingengine.com> <572E3F53.5010703@icloud.com> <ngm5em$jnn$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.489.1462671648.32212.python-list@python.org> <e309810a-d9a7-42b9-8e9f-14b8c03ab482@googlegroups.com>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:108486

Show key headers only | View raw

On 5/10/2016 9:51 AM, Claudiu Popa wrote:

> Thank you for letting us know. While pylint is indeed
> opinionated in some cases, we're not trying to be
> "arrogant", as you put it, towards Guido or the other core
> developers. What's sad in this particular case is that the
> feedback had to come in rather a harsh manner, on this group,
> instead of being reported as a bug or an enhancement on pylint's
> bug tracker.

My impression is that the objection to 'bad builtin' was communicated 
somehow to someone involved with PyLint  at least a year ago and ignored 
or outright rejected.  But I don't remember details.  I might be 
mistaken or have been given false information.

> Anyway, I wanted to tell you that I agree with your opinion
> regarding that message and as such, it is removed and won't be
> emitted anymore in the next release (1.6)

Then my harsh comment re pylint is not currently valid.  Thank you.

Hiring managers misusing the score to evaluate applicants is a different 
issue.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter... Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-05-07 21:40 -0400
  Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter... Claudiu Popa <pcmanticore@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 06:51 -0700
    Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter... Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-05-11 00:58 +1000
      Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter... pcmanticore@gmail.com - 2016-05-10 08:35 -0700
        Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter... Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-05-10 15:47 -0400
        Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 06:22 +1000
    Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter... Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-05-11 01:20 +1000
    Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter... Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-05-10 15:34 -0400
      Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-10 16:42 -0400

csiph-web