Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #64271
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:not': 0.03; 'operator': 0.03; 'binary': 0.07; "subject:' ": 0.07; "'a'": 0.09; 'arguments': 0.09; 'function,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'jan': 0.12; 'assume': 0.14; '(also': 0.16; '*expression*': 0.16; 'boolean': 0.16; 'conditional': 0.16; 'evaluates': 0.16; 'expressions.': 0.16; 'operator.': 0.16; 'overridden': 0.16; 'overriding': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'first.': 0.19; 'unlike': 0.19; 'written': 0.21; 'example': 0.22; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'equivalent': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints- To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'evaluation': 0.30; "skip:' 10": 0.31; 'once,': 0.31; 'yes.': 0.31; 'could': 0.34; 'case,': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'flow': 0.39; 'functional': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'called': 0.40; 'expression': 0.60; 'received:173': 0.61; 'here': 0.66; 'evaluate': 0.72; 'special': 0.74; "'and'": 0.84; '(*),': 0.84; 'otten': 0.84; 'overloading': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'whereas': 0.91 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
| Subject | 'and' is not exactly an 'operator' (was Re: numpy.where() and multiple comparisons) |
| Date | Sat, 18 Jan 2014 19:12:35 -0500 |
| References | <5617a90f-3d9b-48b2-b449-9e5ef4c181e5@googlegroups.com> <52d9e408$0$29769$862e30e2@ngroups.net> <39d6bb6a-ce34-469e-8cb3-24a14331d6c5@googlegroups.com> <lbdf6o$jmb$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | pool-173-75-254-207.phlapa.fios.verizon.net |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <lbdf6o$jmb$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5696.1390090373.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 32 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1390090373 news.xs4all.nl 2892 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57486 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:64271 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 1/18/2014 3:50 AM, Peter Otten wrote:
> Unlike `&` `and` cannot be overridden (*),
> (*) I assume overriding would collide with short-cutting of boolean
> expressions.
Yes. 'and' could be called a 'control-flow operator', but in Python it
is not a functional operator.
A functional binary operator expression like 'a + b' abbreviates a
function call, without using (). In this case, it could be written
'operator.add(a,b)'. This function, or it internal equivalent, calls
either a.__add__(b) or b.__radd__(a) or both. It is the overloading of
the special methods that overrides the operator.
The control flow expression 'a and b' cannot abbreviate a function call
because Python calls always evaluate all arguments first. It is
equivalent* to the conditional (control flow) *expression* (also not a
function operator) 'a if not a else b'. Evaluation of either expression
calls bool(a) and hence a.__bool__ or a.__len__.
'a or b' is equivalent* to 'a if a else b'
* 'a (and/or) b' evaluates 'a' once, whereas 'a if (not/)a else b'
evaluates 'a' twice. This is not equivalent when there are side-effects.
Here is an example where this matters.
input('enter a non-0 number :') or 1
--
Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
numpy.where() and multiple comparisons John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-01-17 17:51 -0800
Re: numpy.where() and multiple comparisons duncan smith <buzzard@invalid.invalid> - 2014-01-18 02:16 +0000
Re: numpy.where() and multiple comparisons John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-01-17 20:00 -0800
Re: numpy.where() and multiple comparisons Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-01-18 09:50 +0100
Re: numpy.where() and multiple comparisons Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2014-01-18 13:20 -0800
'and' is not exactly an 'operator' (was Re: numpy.where() and multiple comparisons) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-01-18 19:12 -0500
csiph-web