Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #93909
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Mapping, with sequence as key, wildcard and subsequence matching |
| Date | 2015-07-16 08:24 +0100 |
| References | (1 earlier) <55a72c8b$0$1671$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <85fv4oveb2.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <55A74FAC.4090807@stoneleaf.us> <85y4igtxoh.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mo7lar$jv8$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.568.1437031467.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 16/07/2015 08:09, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 16/07/2015 07:37, Ben Finney wrote: >> Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> writes: >> >>> On 07/15/2015 10:53 PM, Ben Finney wrote: >>>> Are those the ‘__contains__’, ‘__getitem__’ methods? What actually >>>> is the API of a mapping type, that would need to be customised for >>>> this application? >>> >>> The problem is that potential key matches are found by hashes >> >> For the Python ‘dict’ type, yes. I already know that I don't want that >> type, I want a custom mapping type which matches keys according to the >> algorithm I specify. >> >> So, I'm not asking “how do I make ‘dict’ do this?”. I am instead asking >> “how do I implement a custom type which can duck-type for ‘dict’ but >> have a different key-lookup implementation?”. >> > > https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html?emulating-container-types > > > <quote> > The collections module provides a MutableMapping abstract base class to > help create those methods from a base set of __getitem__(), > __setitem__(), __delitem__(), and keys() > </quote> > > Hence > https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.abc.html#collections.abc.MutableMapping > > > Hunting for examples got me to > http://code.activestate.com/recipes/578096-a-mutablemapping-that-can-use-unhashable-objects-a/ > so fingers crossed, I'm just hoping that we're going in the right > direction. > Drat, should have scrolled down one more page on the activestate recipe, Stephen D'Aprano comment. <quote> This is very ingenious, but I wouldn't want to touch it with a ten foot pole for production code </quote> Eric Snow replied. <quote> Oh yeah. I wouldn't use it in production either. :) I expect you could iron out the wrinkles, but there are better solutions. </quote> -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mapping, with sequence as key, wildcard and subsequence matching Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-07-16 11:51 +1000
Re: Mapping, with sequence as key, wildcard and subsequence matching Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-16 14:01 +1000
Re: Mapping, with sequence as key, wildcard and subsequence matching Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-07-16 15:53 +1000
Re: Mapping, with sequence as key, wildcard and subsequence matching Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-07-15 23:31 -0700
Re: Mapping, with sequence as key, wildcard and subsequence matching Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-07-16 16:37 +1000
Re: Mapping, with sequence as key, wildcard and subsequence matching Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-16 08:09 +0100
Re: Mapping, with sequence as key, wildcard and subsequence matching Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-16 08:24 +0100
Re: Mapping, with sequence as key, wildcard and subsequence matching Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-07-16 09:53 +0300
csiph-web