Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo?

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!nzpost1.xs4all.net!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<tim.peters@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.004
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.99; 'S': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.03; 'cpython': 0.05; 'method.': 0.05; 'computed': 0.07; 'implements': 0.07; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'agree,': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; '(at': 0.13; 'applies': 0.15; '4-byte': 0.16; 'utc': 0.16; 'exists': 0.18; 'integer': 0.18; ';-)': 0.18; 'programmer': 0.18; 'subject:] ': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'cc:2**2': 0.20; 'subject:skip:i 10': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'not.': 0.27; 'least': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; "i'm": 0.30; 'that.': 0.30; 'code': 0.30; 'seconds': 0.31; 'implement': 0.32; 'expensive': 0.32; 'skip:. 10': 0.32; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'authors': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'depends': 0.36; 'faster': 0.36; 'subject:" ': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'turn': 0.37; 'no,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'more': 0.63; 'times': 0.63; 'within': 0.64; 'subject:there': 0.66; 'firing': 0.84; 'premature': 0.84; 'subject:any': 0.84; 'worried': 0.84; 'subject:Are': 0.95
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=G2STDmM0WzDckaUHb+p8KdjU8qc9sx+TFiJC/241yzI=; b=PTyYSKr0wQFxizogCU3utnvmMTBIAArY/mKbrDkap3folQqKp2RbVP+PZWNSalVmCF UAdPUXyJrebUnWTG11poGpYR0XlYI/osUbzggEd2+jQ+6WSDWntJcVdTVR89iklN/m14 gc5Q/H/oAQgxyeO4+wtkkwfvE1ZoQnJ0wYspdJW3TTDZTv61tVRt3EMFZ5byAAgy4Prh 6Qrs8JnGc3dJUWbU74H+3w6hgFNNe/1XOWGkFGqcyFSyozShhqDwmM/xtERpCAPG/Os1 ngztaoXcd7QaV1MWr77Z/j4NLVpQqqR1wDPFPmhuzGG7L0VveJYgf/eiy3pG4rZi2QS0 mLzQ==
X-Received	by 10.182.28.165 with SMTP id c5mr14170579obh.29.1442262185682; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version	1.0
In-Reply-To	<CAP7h-xbdx+f2SSYbBCXqzsasTF8kP5hGAnJQtvK9f1z6sPvxhw@mail.gmail.com>
References	<m2h9mzqyy7.fsf@fastmail.com> <CAExdVNm0rrxhbSONfQdor7e=9t+6Tg3hh6eFq-h0NnfdpteVYg@mail.gmail.com> <1442085362.324875.381920729.5E7A6DCE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAExdVNnUwRKN2q=trpnD9=mxnXvuosWKO+s5=PCfjAO45-Yugw@mail.gmail.com> <CAP7h-xYFAggqbJBNCZbYFwUqCPzW7-4Rc0x_SzgAumpFYAr6oA@mail.gmail.com> <CAExdVNmfTsqunRR_b-Q1YqWrTjsV1L5ppAoAnL7SUwgR2PFU0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAP7h-xbqq2Eu+vVO2g4WmbRJ=gmL1r9D2sWhKe=qQ8Ev-n415w@mail.gmail.com> <CAP7+vJ+1Vg21qOWAD+9R2REDnWiW4o6nj=Rh8fx3x3cAZipcdw@mail.gmail.com> <CAP7h-xbA6ZagKj+rQ_cCc8d0oK1F329AAhSjY240iiDyB4756A@mail.gmail.com> <CAExdVNnw6zfJQ_wFOurjj6kcLcbr9RgXA7kvyNPmgraMcHU4vQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAP7h-xYp=MsOcvFXNCHNkXDDGH=jcAwYSSw1WWchy5bwZKjwLA@mail.gmail.com> <201509131224.t8DCOXHO004891@fido.openend.se> <CAExdVNkN465=bWeY61PFAxpiUQ-u0p2zaqtwH8PQWyQO4Jw9Mg@mail.gmail.com> <201509131600.t8DG07e0025688@fido.openend.se> <CAExdVNm3e43mJ3tqcUc9175WssV4zeuO024svJbMTjrTab=Qew@mail.gmail.com> <201509132031.t8DKVTwJ028027@fido.openend.se> <CAExdVNkeRVgV8CXLugMgqhUSuXU=qHYSFUo24Xw83X=8tVBjCg@mail.gmail.com> <201509140827.t8E8RPqb001076@fido.openend.se> <CAExdVNn2wM8YW=Jg=aM86X6RaaVYPTioTSJ2d1gGp0k76CN3mg@mail.gmail.com> <1442257996.253100.383441705.7A0986C7@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAExdVN=s_V_uz9mSOtp6b6+fKjqLZHArXKUQ-ty5EYkLM5V2qw@mail.gmail.com> <CAP7h-xa3fu5Yo5GGdqDiM-vgxFJnwW9SQYW9Hcm1+Jfpy6csmA@mail.gmail.com> <CAExdVN=TYS-xZWKRy7nVh0_V9SC6-WPh2KPE5E1fN1qd+sNeeA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP7h-xbdx+f2SSYbBCXqzsasTF8kP5hGAnJQtvK9f1z6sPvxhw@mail.gmail.com>
From	Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com>
Date	Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:22:50 -0500
Subject	Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo?
To	Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopolsky@gmail.com>
Cc	Random832 <random832@fastmail.com>, Python-List <python-list@python.org>, datetime-sig <datetime-sig@python.org>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.20+
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.565.1442262194.8327.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	26
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1442262194 news.xs4all.nl 23787 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:51210
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:96602

Show key headers only | View raw

[Tim]
>> It depends on how expensive .utcoffset()
>> is, which in turn depends on how the tzinfo author implements it.

[Alex]
> No, it does not.  In most time zones, UTC offset in seconds can be computed
> by C code as a 4-byte integer

Which is a specific implementation of .utcoffset().  Which likely has
nothing to do with how most tzinfo authors will implement _their_
.utcoffset().  For example, look at any tzinfo.utcoffset()
implementation that currently exists ;-)


> faster
> than CPython can look up the .utcoffset method. (At least for times
> within a few years around now.) A programmer who makes it slower should
> be fired.

So any programmer who implements .utcoffset() in Python should be
fired?  That's the only way I can read that.


> Yet I agree,  "'premature optimization' applies at this time."

I'm more worried now about premature firing ;-)

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo? Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:22 -0500

csiph-web