Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #12429
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.001 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'string.': 0.04; 'suppose': 0.05; 'exec': 0.07; 'globals': 0.09; 'received:188.220': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'that).': 0.09; 'def': 0.15; 'last,': 0.16; 'src,': 0.16; 'test()': 0.16; 'test():': 0.16; 'looked': 0.16; 'wrote': 0.20; '(or': 0.23; '(though': 0.23; 'extract': 0.24; 'function': 0.27; 'definition': 0.30; 'expression': 0.32; 'source': 0.33; 'there': 0.33; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.33; 'rules': 0.34; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.35; 'regular': 0.35; 'doing': 0.36; 'but': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'user': 0.39; 'why': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'subject:from': 0.40; 'more': 0.60; '"for': 0.67; 'received:188': 0.68; 'locals': 0.84; 'received:bethere.co.uk': 0.84; 'subject:value': 0.84; 'subject:better': 0.93 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Rob Williscroft <rtw@rtw.me.uk> |
| Subject | Re: Returning a value from exec or a better solution |
| Date | Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:28:41 +0000 (UTC) |
| References | <CAG5udOg=GtFGPmTB=1OJNvNRPdYUcxDoKN1WJQMOMv9gx0+fZA@mail.gmail.com> <Xns9F50BCB7B5708rtwfreenetREMOVEcouk@80.91.229.10> <CAG5udOh1+oE4g9Frjp3pucbHUtWcN34KK35a-Xs2YqkZH9X5=w@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | 188-220-43-229.zone11.bethere.co.uk |
| User-Agent | Xnews/5.04.25 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.564.1314689337.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 30 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1314689337 news.xs4all.nl 2421 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50444 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:12429 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Jack Trades wrote in
news:CAG5udOh1+oE4g9Frjp3pucbHUtWcN34KK35a-Xs2YqkZH9X5=w@mail.gmail.com
in gmane.comp.python.general:
>> def test():
>> src = (
>> "def double(x):"
>> " return x * 2"
>> )
>> globals = {}
>> exec( src, globals )
>> return globals[ "double" ]
>>
>> print( test() )
>>
>
> I looked into doing it that way but it still requires that the user
> use a specific name for the function they are defining. The docs on
> exec say that an implementation may populate globals or locals with
> whatever they want so that also rules out doing a simple "for item in
> globals", as there may be more than just the one function in there
> (though I suppose I may be able to work around that).
>
>
Why not just get the name from the user, or use a regular expression
to extract the first (or last, maybe) definition from the source string.
Rob.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Returning a value from exec or a better solution Rob Williscroft <rtw@rtw.me.uk> - 2011-08-30 07:28 +0000
csiph-web