Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #64075

Re: data validation when creating an object

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <rmorgan466@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.02; '16,': 0.03; 'argument': 0.05; 'advocate': 0.07; 'context': 0.07; 'conventions': 0.07; 'patterns.': 0.07; 'advice.': 0.09; 'appropriate.': 0.09; 'constructor': 0.09; 'facts': 0.09; 'specific.': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'jan': 0.12; 'called.': 0.16; 'cons': 0.16; 'constructor.': 0.16; 'encountered,': 0.16; 'finney': 0.16; 'garrett': 0.16; 'informally,': 0.16; 'initialiser': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'simpson': 0.16; 'subject:object': 0.16; 'subject:when': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'normally': 0.19; 'thu,': 0.19; 'later': 0.20; 'seems': 0.21; 'saying': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; "shouldn't": 0.24; 'tend': 0.24; 'cheers,': 0.24; '---': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; '&gt;': 0.26; 'define': 0.26; 'first,': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'url:mailman': 0.30; 'work.': 0.31; 'commonly': 0.31; 'writes:': 0.31; 'open': 0.33; 'says': 0.33; 'url:python': 0.33; 'everyone': 0.33; "i'd": 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'advice': 0.35; 'agree': 0.35; 'classes': 0.35; 'beyond': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'c++': 0.36; 'instances': 0.36; 'largely': 0.36; 'subject:data': 0.36; 'url:listinfo': 0.36; 'thanks': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'ben': 0.38; 'depends': 0.38; 'that,': 0.38; 'anything': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'bill': 0.39; 'use.': 0.39; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'read': 0.60; 'new': 0.61; 'making': 0.63; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'smith': 0.68; 'subject': 0.69; 'stated': 0.69; 'mistaken': 0.84; 'out....': 0.84; 'replies.': 0.84
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=q0cSpwGl7TvjbXfX+JusvaPkTyA1lq8FvwaAJ4KJ6wo=; b=Rwja++RmzJI6jOeBB9ShNfHQxozeyEgpOsNLAeu7ztiTOwbyd8BVqqdMdI1fuYISyu wVkSEjQPqNVs6t0VjB8spBPeCRWRRideS7H7/n6Kz5IySMPvPHkGh5jdrtske+7+Rpqp NTOjuB/mriri2nL6omgvH13ITSXnIUqtsU9hp7kKCHdxqq5UyedgH6hqXeMAwulbTINp /6BIJ5dA6EW6XAdtk2r0u2Lv+GshazJiPHRC8zpAQWWXUqBPNlXDw6HYvXopqUh7pg0i Jxe5E8OSK4uhchjlalNV6kkIiv9Edl/Omq7MnJoHeVvSi3k5/AOK8aJo4SLeZO06FwGf q7eA==
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.182.19.132 with SMTP id f4mr6647648obe.14.1389873678033; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 04:01:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <20140116063654.GA23771@cskk.homeip.net>
References <7wha94bk7v.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <20140116063654.GA23771@cskk.homeip.net>
Date Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:01:17 -0500
Subject Re: data validation when creating an object
From Rita <rmorgan466@gmail.com>
To Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2aa6adca82b04f0152e68
Cc "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.5584.1389873681.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 150
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1389873681 news.xs4all.nl 2858 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37159
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:64075

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Thanks everyone for the replies.




On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> wrote:

> On 16Jan2014 15:53, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> > Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> writes:
> > >  Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> > > > Who says it's frowned on to do work in the initialiser? Where are
> they
> > > > saying it? That seems over-broad, I'd like to read the context of
> that
> > > > advice.
> > >
> > > There are some people who advocate that C++ constructors should not do
> > > a lot of work and/or should be incapable of throwing exceptions. The
> > > pros and cons of that argument are largely C++ specific. […]
> >
> > Even simpler: They are mistaken in what the constructor is named, in
> > Python.
> > Python classes have the constructor, ‘__new__’. I would agree with
> > advice not to do anything but allocate the resources for a new instance
> > in the constructor. [...]
> >
> > Python instances have an initialiser, ‘__init__’. That function is for
> > setting up the specific instance for later use. This is commonly
> > over-ridden and many classes define a custom initialiser, which normally
> > does some amount of work.
> >
> > I don't think ‘__init__’ is subject to the conventions of a constructor,
> > because *‘__init__’ is not a constructor*.
>
> 99% of the time this distinction is moot. When I call ClassName(blah,...),
> both the constructor and initialiser are called.
>
> Informally, there's a rule of thumb that making an object (allocate,
> construct and initialise) shouldn't be needlessly expensive. Beyond
> that, what happens depends on the use patterns.
>
> This rule of thumb will be what Rita's encountered, perhaps stated
> without any qualification regarding what's appropriate.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
>
> The problem with keeping an open mind is that my ideas all tend to fall
> out...
>         - Bill Garrett <garrett@cs.unc.edu>
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>



-- 
--- Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.--

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: data validation when creating an object Rita <rmorgan466@gmail.com> - 2014-01-16 07:01 -0500

csiph-web