Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #20029
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <chris@rebertia.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.005 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'pypi': 0.04; 'instance,': 0.05; 'repository': 0.05; 'integration,': 0.07; 'semantic': 0.07; 'tagged': 0.07; 'it;': 0.09; 'problem:': 0.09; 'output': 0.10; 'am,': 0.12; 'armin': 0.16; 'developer:': 0.16; 'in-line': 0.16; 'kern': 0.16; 'metrics': 0.16; '\xc2\xa0i': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python- list': 0.16; 'wed,': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'seems': 0.20; 'cheers,': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'feb': 0.22; 'stack': 0.24; 'received:209.85.220': 0.25; 'cc:2**0': 0.26; 'module': 0.26; 'code': 0.26; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'seem': 0.29; '(and': 0.30; 'exists,': 0.30; 'for,': 0.30; 'separately.': 0.30; 'chris': 0.30; 'least': 0.30; 'pretty': 0.31; 'usually': 0.31; 'point,': 0.32; 'modules': 0.32; 'there': 0.33; 'it.': 0.33; '(for': 0.35; 'install': 0.35; 'example,': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'posts': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'useful': 0.38; 'should': 0.38; 'sometimes': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.39; 'type': 0.61; 'social': 0.62; 'kind': 0.62; 'chance': 0.62; 'information,': 0.69; 'low': 0.74; 'quality': 0.75; 'branches': 0.84; 'nathan': 0.84; 'pain': 0.84; 'sender:addr:chris': 0.84; 'thumbs': 0.84; 'user:': 0.84; 'url:io': 0.93 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rebertia.com; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=plDdzlLPqyHq8YjcHCPUqH32+Km0uWrTKiOEWzF+uSs=; b=IcXecnG7dR8n1+VPGE7N9+l40SDdKvEJJVzVJhzasXVO5CLV8UH1V2Ip4UYntY63zr cvBH4q+jQEo4mQa72VfB/cQeRdjCnQmCA7VKWQ9/WrAPqkg7LjqHJIp8wui/a+vLOCnw j68As+itzFH1D5rRKlw9iZk2WPTVMcSjhWJa4= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Sender | chris@rebertia.com |
| In-Reply-To | <CAOFbRmJ5Y0GURNfncdrg45VnCp89qsjLrvTtB0Ouvb86JZc7Fg@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <CAOFbRmJ5Y0GURNfncdrg45VnCp89qsjLrvTtB0Ouvb86JZc7Fg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Date | Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:47:34 -0800 |
| X-Google-Sender-Auth | QxLJ_G5BF9jNT7fb7S0s94Bx_3I |
| Subject | Re: Looking for PyPi 2.0... |
| From | Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> |
| To | Nathan Rice <nathan.alexander.rice@gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| Cc | python-list <python-list@python.org> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5548.1328723258.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 37 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1328723258 news.xs4all.nl 6894 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59496 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:20029 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nathan Rice <nathan.alexander.rice@gmail.com> wrote: > As a user: > * Finding the right module in PyPi is a pain because there is limited, > low quality semantic information, and there is no code indexing. > * I have to install the module to examine it; I don't need to look at > docs all the time, sometimes I just want a > package/class/function/method breakdown. > * Given the previous point, having in-line documentation would be nice > (for instance, just the output of .. automodule::) > * Package usage/modification stats are not well exposed > * No code metrics are available > * I would like some kind of social service integration, for tagging > and +1/likes. I know ratings were scrapped (and they weren't that > useful anyhow), but for example, if Armin Ronacher or Robert Kern > thumbs up a module there is a pretty good chance I will be interested > in it. > > As a developer: > * I don't want to have to maintain my code repository and my package > releases separately. I want to let module repository know that my > code repository exists, and that branches tagged as "release" should > be made available. > * I want to maintain one README. > > > I don't like "someone needs to do this now" type posts but every time > I use PyPi it infuratiates me. I usually end up finding modules via > Stack Overflow, which seems silly to me. They don't have all the features you're looking for, but at least they seem to be working on the problem: http://crate.io Cheers, Chris
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Looking for PyPi 2.0... Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-02-08 09:47 -0800
Re: Looking for PyPi 2.0... John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2012-02-15 13:24 -0800
Re: Looking for PyPi 2.0... Nathan Rice <nathan.alexander.rice@gmail.com> - 2012-02-15 16:53 -0500
csiph-web