Re: efficient way to process data

References	(3 earlier) <CAPTjJmp82qrVz03sZFLXyju0oL-3=qJrcn34UJU6N4qo+wF6tw@mail.gmail.com> <CACwCsY74dTc9vJ=j06Fq9rqXe_wmSHpYQ-qaC284CcgjEnrQ9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmrv7aG09p8H_v6tyJRQHo37o=_2ZX0sL96L_ZaDsddJNw@mail.gmail.com> <CACwCsY62pqvKVrs11+yv5Ox9QBSv4McQDZ3-0aGnaUezfm2Ywg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmp3MW2a1SE-zqZY5ZJSeZ3wnt+NnjKTuWYY1Coi5dLt5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date	2014-01-14 09:23 -0700
Subject	Re: efficient way to process data
From	Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.5463.1389716584.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> if you're interested in what the application is, this is data
>> collected with an electron microscope from semiconductor wafers as
>> they are being manufactured. The x and y are the position on the wafer
>> that the data was collected, in microns. If 2 data points are
>> collected within 1 micron of each other they need to be combined when
>> being analyzed.
>
> As far as I'm concerned, you won geek cred the moment you said
> "electron microscope", and "semiconductor wafers as they are being
> manufactured" is just gravy.

Thanks! You made my day. I showed this to my wife and she asked "Is that good?"

> Do you actually mean here that the two points need to be within 1
> micron, or that data gets combined if it's nearby in *either*
> coordinate?

Either coordinate.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: efficient way to process data Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> - 2014-01-14 09:23 -0700

csiph-web