Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #92723
| Date | 2015-06-16 22:39 -0600 |
|---|---|
| From | Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: mix-in classes |
| References | <mailman.1.1432432413.5151.python-list@python.org> <5561b200$0$13002$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CADL-Dvh1W-_3C2m5AcgYct1gUb1oQjX30PKGM8JjJeRYNZAa9g@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.538.1434515967.13271.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 06/16/2015 07:55 PM, Dr. John Q. Hacker wrote: > Interesting. This brings up an issue another poster brought up: In my > usage of the term "parent", I use it to mean the class that is a product of > object composition: > > class Parent(child1, child2): pass Hmm. This is a definition of "parent" I've never heard of before. And it's opposite to the use of the word in all contexts I'm aware of.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
mix-in classes "Dr. John Q. Hacker" <zondervanz@gmail.com> - 2015-05-23 20:53 -0500
Re: mix-in classes Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-24 21:11 +1000
Re: mix-in classes Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 22:39 -0600
csiph-web