Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #93858
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Improve usage of Python 3 |
| Date | 2015-07-15 05:33 -0400 |
| References | <55A538C9.5050509@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.533.1436952850.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 7/14/2015 12:28 PM, Marcos wrote: > Hi! > > Just like many, I want the projects in which I work on to move to Python 3. > > And incredibly, there are a few users on the same project who refuse to > use python 3 simply because of the print statement. > > That has probably already been discussed, but since I actually couldn't > find anything relevant about, I decided to ask here anyway. > > What are the changes of something like > > from __past__ import print_statement 0 > or to make both > > print This already works, like any other name >>> print <built-in function print> To add to what Chris said, this means that print can be rebound just like any other name. For example: >>> import builtins >>> builtins.print <built-in function print> >>> def print(*args, **kwargs): kwargs['sep'] = '|' builtins.print(*args, **kwargs) >>> print(1,2,3) 1|2|3 > and > > print() > > work on Python 3 ? -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Improve usage of Python 3 Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-07-15 05:33 -0400
csiph-web