Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #52447

Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List?

References <mailman.468.1376201912.1251.python-list@python.org> <520754d7$0$30000$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.474.1376214330.1251.python-list@python.org> <5207722c$0$30000$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
From Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws>
Date 2013-08-13 09:40 +0100
Subject Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List?
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.524.1376383259.1251.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 11 August 2013 12:14, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 10:44:40 +0100, Joshua Landau wrote:
>>>> "café" will be in your Copy-Paste buffer, and you can paste it in to
>>>> the tweet-box. It takes 5 characters. So much for testing ;).
>>>
>>> How do you know that it takes 5 characters? Is that some Javascript
>>> widget? I'd blame buggy Javascript before Twitter.
>>
>> I go to twitter.com, log in and press that odd blue compose button in
>> the top-right. After pasting at says I have 135 (down from 140)
>> characters left.
>
> I'm pretty sure that will be a piece of Javascript running in your
> browser that reports the number of characters in the text box. So, I
> would expect that either:
>
> - Javascript doesn't provide a way to normalize text;
>
> - Twitter's Javascript developer(s) don't know how to normalize text, or
> can't be bothered to follow company policy (shame on them);
>
> - the Javascript just asks the browser, and the browser doesn't know how
> to count characters the Twitter way;
>
> etc. But of course posting to Twitter via your browser isn't the only way
> to post. Twitter provide an API to twit, and *that* is the ultimate test
> of whether Twitter's dev guide is lying or not.

Well, I've done some further testing and it seems you're right. It's
just the javascript that's wrong. I guess they did it for better
load-times.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-08-11 07:17 +0100
  Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-08-11 09:09 +0000
    Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-08-11 10:44 +0100
      Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-08-11 11:14 +0000
        Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-11 12:45 +0100
        Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-08-11 12:59 +0100
        Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-08-13 09:40 +0100
    Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2013-08-11 05:51 -0700
      Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-08-11 14:07 +0100

csiph-web