Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #19607
| Date | 2012-01-30 18:56 +0100 |
|---|---|
| From | Aaron <aaron.l.france@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: except clause syntax question |
| References | <E1A3D6A5-CCE8-4D87-82E0-938159D0CE61@declareSub.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5219.1327946266.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 01/30/2012 06:41 PM, Charles Yeomans wrote: > To catch more than one exception type in an except block, one writes > > except (A, B, C) as e: > > I'm wondering why it was decided to match tuples, but not lists: > > except [A, B, C] as e: > > The latter makes more sense semantically to me -- "catch all exception types in a list" as opposed to "catch this single thing composed of three exception types". > > > Charles Yeomans > > Then, semantically, shouldn't it be a set?
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: except clause syntax question Aaron <aaron.l.france@gmail.com> - 2012-01-30 18:56 +0100
csiph-web