Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #52432

Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List?

Return-Path <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.074
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.85; '*S*': 0.00; 'argument': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'alter': 0.09; 'changed;': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'limit,': 0.16; 'subject:Could': 0.16; 'subject:Unicode': 0.16; 'tweak': 0.16; 'unlikely': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'variable': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'aug': 0.22; 'together.': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'correct': 0.29; 'michael': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'character': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; '13,': 0.31; 'culture.': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'another': 0.32; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'subject:List': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'being': 0.38; 'system,': 0.38; 'whatever': 0.38; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'most': 0.60; "you're": 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'phone': 0.66; 'yes': 0.68; 'sms': 0.68; 'limit': 0.70; 'felt': 0.74; 'subject:this': 0.83; '160': 0.84; 'sms.': 0.84; 'subject:you': 0.87; 'response,': 0.91; '2013': 0.98
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0DMJrMPPOO5ZvaRgBuT4bViFLa6XUm/YSFd+Gjx4c44=; b=xlSBF5GMYTdT4KLixZeH7yStzgU0O5j+fNUxIviH2WGXBQYuEO4E7By+758ZCXy1Td cxHGVoXut0hdtL8r94mdkI9WoLbl/c/u9cgZClHh8HraftOZGDt+8bwYpjULyNN0Izrh Qa1XfrFx/NJ0EzWaXrA1tYmGcGujhbkdyUCuROwUf6zaqWudiutz4eHSxYBxc7mXSPiO za0Jli6Pbgs5ldAvp5FhV2NpcI0VbROXP7YwBVyHhQDuPsn2K2WhakqQfBIAZ0xT78aG 2GswQQ1bVhTjveFRhDFeiNkgT6Qn8yc7RUlWLdUs41bNuKDASa2+0NIfY9uoajQu6KE+ Vdeg==
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.58.249.236 with SMTP id yx12mr1814913vec.25.1376358878109; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <52099088.7030300@gmail.com>
References <CAN1F8qXgBwTGSkbP3N1uJZPJw1CY=4O4ptQurV-2=Gmm4UiYbw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmp1PFP8d8F1KVfaatDA56NszJK3SqO_sGORhhOEeGaJ+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAN1F8qVh1SrZAbL62s2AxT4QV3_TiZAK7j17z4toBTDZEdiYVQ@mail.gmail.com> <5207AF15.7040604@mrabarnett.plus.com> <mailman.488.1376270824.1251.python-list@python.org> <b6rbk2F6u34U1@mid.individual.net> <52099088.7030300@gmail.com>
Date Tue, 13 Aug 2013 02:54:38 +0100
Subject Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List?
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To python-list@python.org
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.516.1376358881.1251.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 27
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1376358881 news.xs4all.nl 15940 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53059
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.stben.net!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:52432

Show key headers only | View raw


On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/11/2013 11:54 PM, Gregory Ewing wrote:
>> Michael Torrie wrote:
>>> I've always wondered if the 160 character limit or whatever it is is a
>>> hard limit in their system, or if it's just a variable they could tweak
>>> if they felt like it.
>>
>> Isn't it for compatibility with SMS? Twitter could
>> probably change it, but persuading all the cell phone
>> networks to change at the same time might be rather
>> difficult.
>
> Yes I think you're correct about it being limited for SMS.
>
> However I know of no phone or network that won't let you use longer
> messages; multiple SMS packets are used and most phone paste them back
> together.  So no there's nothing that anyone needs to change to use
> longer messages if they so chose.  It's now just an arbitrary limit,
> part of the twitter culture.

It's unlikely to be changed; the limit demands brevity. 160 may be
arbitrary now, but without strong argument for another cutoff, there's
no reason to alter it.

And that's my response, in 160 characters. :)

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-08-11 19:26 -0600
  Re: Could you verify this,   Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-08-12 17:54 +1200
    Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-13 02:54 +0100
    Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-08-12 19:48 -0600
    Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? Jason Friedman <jsf80238@gmail.com> - 2013-08-12 21:20 -0600
    Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-08-13 04:32 +0100
    Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-13 09:14 +0100
    RE: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com.dmarc.invalid> - 2013-08-13 15:34 +0000
      Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-08-14 06:36 +0000

csiph-web